Laserfiche WebLink
Mean concentrations of POM in the tailwater of Lake <br />Havasu (Parker Dam) was 0.89 g/m3, but this <br />decreased to 0.75 g/ms at Headgate Rock Dam, <br />about 30 kilometers downstream. Whether this was <br />due to filtering and processing by benthic inverte- <br />brates (i.e., they ingested the material) or some other <br />factor was not determined. Phytoplankton species <br />collected below Lake Mohave and Lake Havasu <br />reflected the lentic conditions of the reservoirs. <br />Investigators have found the return to lotic conditions <br />below the dam tends to be inhospitable to reservoir- <br />produced algae that are not suited to riverine <br />conditions (Stober 1963 [38]; Soballe and Bachmann <br />1984 [391). In this study, of the lower Colorado River, <br />zooplankton from reservoirs did not seem to survive <br />a great distance downstream. Petts (1984 [3]) found <br />the number of drifting zooplankton decreased rapidly <br />downstream from the lake outlet caused by the <br />filtering effect of bottom vegetation. Other investi- <br />gators (Ward, 1975 [30]; Armitage, 1977 [32]; <br />Sandlund, 1982 [40]; Herlong and Mallin, 1985 [41 ]) <br />have reported a rapid decrease in zooplankton <br />densities and a change in composition and size from <br />large to small zooplankton in impounded rivers <br />within 7 kilometers of a dam. <br />The POM decreased between Parker and Headgate <br />Rock Dams and began to increase 60 km downstream <br />from Headgate Rock Dam. During phase 1, POM <br />increased by: <br />of the nutrient (Newbold et al., 1983 [43]). In the <br />lower Colorado River phosphorus was often unde- <br />tected, and when detected showed no upstream to <br />downstream trend. Total phosphorus (TP) includes <br />various soluble and insoluble, organic and inorganic <br />phosphorus forms (U.S. Geological Survey, 1977 <br />[441). While orthophosphorus (PO4-P) is commonly <br />measured because it is immediately available for <br />algal uptake and growth (Cole 1979 [45]), Lambou <br />et al. (1976 [23]) points out that due to the "... high <br />mobility and short turnover times of phosphorus <br />within the general 'phosphorus pool,' TP is often a <br />good approximation of bioavailable phosphorus." <br />Because phosphorus often occurs in a particulate <br />form, being absorbed onto soil particles or chemically <br />bound to iron (Buckman and Brady, 1969 [461), it <br />is susceptible to increased loading with increased <br />stream flow. In the Colorado River system, the <br />retention of sediment by reservoirs has been blamed <br />for phosphorus-limited conditions and nutrient <br />limitation in both reservoirs and the river (Gloss et <br />al., 1981 [47]). However, during this study, nutrient <br />levels observed along the main channel stations <br />were similar to the levels in tailwaters. For example, <br />TP ranged from 0.007 to 0.014 mg/L at all stations <br />except the Palo Verde Irrigation Drain. These levels <br />are similar to annual mean values for TP in upper <br />Colorado River reservoirs reported by Paulson and <br />Baker (1984 [48]). In 1981, they found mean TP <br />levels, mg/L, to be: <br />• 32 percent from 0.75 g/m3 at Headgate Rock Dam - Lake Powell .... 0.008 <br />to 0.99 g/m3 at Palo Verde Diversion Dam - Lake Mead ...... .008 <br />• 90 percent to 1.88 g/m3 at Cibola - Lake Mohave ... .012 <br />• 14 percent to 2.15 g/m3 at Imperial Dam - Lake Havasu .... .012 <br />Through these reaches POM were dominated by: <br />• Detritus and diatoms in the fine size class <br />(<25 µm) <br />• Green algae in the large size class (>25 µm) <br />• Macrophyte fragments in the coarse size-fraction <br />(>505 µm). <br />Upstream, POM was autochthonously produced due <br />to the stream reaches bordered by Lake Havasu and <br />the fact that POM composition from the reservoir <br />outflow was different than the downstream POM <br />composition. Possible sources for the increased POM <br />downstream are: <br />• In-stream production by autotrophs <br />• Inputs of material from backwater marshes <br />• Inputs from agricultural drains <br />• Inputs from streambed and streambank erosion <br />Generally, nutrient levels increase along a river <br />continuum (Cummins, 1974 [42]) and nutrient <br />cycling is directly related to downstream transport <br />On a broader scale, Plante and Downing (1989 [49]) <br />reported a TP median of 0.013 mg/L for 16 lakes <br />having a wide range in geomorphology across the <br />globe. As stated, the only significant increase in <br />nutrient levels occurred at the Palo Verde Irrigation <br />Drain which reflects fertilizer use. Regarding the <br />origin of the increased POM in river reaches <br />downstream from Lake Havasu, the nutrient levels <br />in the main channel may be low, but not lower than <br />in the upstream reservoirs and certainly high enough <br />to allow some in-channel POM production. It does <br />not appear that in-channel production by autotrophs <br />accounts for the majority of POM increase. This <br />conclusion is supported by results of chlorophyll a <br />analyses that showed no correlation between the <br /><25-µm POM and chlorophyll-indicating autotro- <br />phic production is not the primary source of this <br />organic material. Within these reaches, other <br />possible sources of organic material include off- <br />channel contributions from either backwater <br />marshes or agricultural drains or streambed and <br />streambank erosion. <br />25