My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8132
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8132
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:50:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8132
Author
Lieberman, D. and T. Burke.
Title
Limnology and Drift of Particulate Organic Matter Through the Lower Colorado River.
USFW Year
1991.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
inorganic particulate matter showed similar trends, <br />but this was expected because inorganic material <br />comprises the greatest portion of the total dry weight. <br />The total particulate organic matter showed a <br />different trend; on the average more POM was in <br />the All American Canal and less in the river below <br />the Imperial Dam. The >25-µm POM was signifi- <br />cantly lower at All-American Canal than at Imperial <br />Dam, which indicates that the majority of >25-µm <br />POM did not drift downstream into the All American <br />Canal but probably was broken down further into <br />a smaller size-fraction. The relative proportion of fine <br />and coarse material suggest that the desilting and <br />sluicing operations effect a stirring and breakup of <br />material, thereupon possibly loosening POM from <br />sediment or grinding POM into smaller fragments. <br />For both stations below Imperial Dam desilting/ <br />sluicing works, a greater proportion of POM was in <br />the <25-µm size fraction. <br />Generally, phase 2 data did not show the same trend <br />as phase 1 regarding conditions downstream of <br />Imperial Dam. Where POM increased between <br />Imperial Dam and Yuma in phase 1, POM decreased <br />between these stations during phase 2. Phase 2 data <br />presented here suggest activities in and around <br />Imperial Dam, to some extent, account for the <br />decreased POM between Imperial Dam and Yuma, <br />but it is not possible to determine whether water <br />diversions, desilting works, or sluicing operations <br />functioned independently or together to effect these <br />changes. <br />Storm Events <br />Rainstorms, which fortuitously occurred simultane- <br />ously during on-site sampling, allowed usual <br />observations of changes in the river environment. <br />One such storm event occurred over a three-day <br />period during the August 1988 field sampling; it <br />affected stations from Havasu Delta downstream to <br />Yuma. (The two upstream stations were sampled <br />before the storm.) River water became diluted and <br />resulted in decreased specific conductance at <br />Laguna and Yuma. The highest turbidity levels, for <br />the entire sampling period, were recorded from <br />Cibola to Yuma immediately following this event. <br />Similarly, total phosphorus increased dramatically <br />after the storm, particularly at Imperial Dam where <br />concentrations reached 0.061 mg/L. Storms defi- <br />nitely had a direct effect on the increase in the <br />concentrations of POM. The <25-µm POM was <br />higher following the storm than that measured <br />during the June sampling at all the main channel <br />stations from Cibola to Yuma (table 47A). The <25-µm <br />POM increased to 5.26 g/m3 at Imperial Dam, which <br />was the high reading for the entire sampling period. <br />DISCUSSION <br />The object of this study was to determine the amount <br />of organic matter being transported through the <br />lower Colorado River system and to determine how <br />dams and structures influence transport. Certainly, <br />the lower Colorado River system is not a natural <br />river, but an understanding of how particulate <br />organic matter flows through a natural river system <br />helps one to put the recorded data into perspective. <br />Natural streams receive almost all their biotic energy <br />in the form of dead organic matter contributed to <br />the stream channel from outside sources (Petts, <br />1984 [3]). However, organic matter reflects both <br />allochthonous (external) sources leached, blown, or <br />washed into the channel and autochthonous <br />(internal) sources produced in the channel. Dissolved <br />organic matter (DOM) is normally more abundant <br />than POM in the water proper (Birge and Juday,1934 <br />[24]; Fisher and Likens, 1973 [14]), although POM <br />is considered the main food supply for benthic <br />invertebrates (Wetzel and Rich, 1973 [25]; Goldman <br />and Kimmel, 1978 [26]) and provides a trophic <br />connection between microbial assemblages and <br />macroconsumers (Kondratieff and Simmons, 1985 <br />[2]). <br />The River Continuum Concept, a principle introduced <br />by Vannote et al. (1980[1 ]), has attempted to describe <br />the various morphological and biological changes <br />that occur from upstream to downstream along a <br />natural river. Riverine communities can be separated <br />into three main groups: (1) headwaters (orders 1- <br />3), (2) middle-size streams (orders 4-6), and (3) large <br />rivers (orders >6). Headwater streams are heavily <br />influenced by riparian vegetation, which is respon- <br />sible for large scale inputs of allochthonous <br />nutrients, a major source of new nutrients to the <br />river system. As stream size increases, allochtho- <br />nous inputs become less important and autochtho- <br />nous processing of nutrients-transported from <br />upstream-becomes more important. This transport <br />is the basis for all subsequent living processes. The <br />first affect of this process involves the degradation <br />of the allochthonous material from coarse POM in <br />low order streams to progressively finer POM, <br />ultrafine POM, and eventually to: molecular com- <br />ponents, amino acids, sugars, etc. while proceeding <br />downstream. <br />Webster et al. (1979 [20]) developed a model river <br />system to evaluate POM transport. The authors <br />placed an impoundment in a river model and <br />observed the effects on POM dynamics. They <br />reported that the model did not reflect accurately <br />current knowledge of POM behavior in a river/ <br />reservoir system because of: <br />• Seasonality of allochthonous inputs <br />• Autochthonous sources of POM <br />23
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.