Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />Volume III - Comments and Responses <br />FEIS - Navajo Reservoir Operations <br />The data gathered from the Summer and Winter Flow Tests constitute a small portion of the <br />overall resource impact analysis. Specialists from State agencies and Tribes/Nations were <br />consulted regarding the long-term impacts of low flows on various resources. When it was <br />not possible to fully measure impacts, models (such as those relating to hydrology and <br />physical habitat [trout] simulation) were developed to estimate impacts from both Navajo <br />Reservoir fluctuations and downstream flow changes. <br />General Comment 23: With the lower minimum release, lowered dilution of pollutants <br />• in the river will make it increasingly difficult to comply with Clean Water Act discharge <br />permits, such as permits for municipal sewage treatment plants (e.g., Bloomfield's). This is <br />particularly true because of EPA's move towards permitted discharge levels based on Total <br />Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL). <br /> The DEIS needs more information on water quality impacts and the effects on people, <br /> including the effects on their water supply. Increased concentration of fecal coliforms and <br />- other pollutants would cause health and other problems. Is mitigation proposed for water <br />- quality impacts? Pollutants in agricultural runoff and also heavy metal and selenium <br /> pollutants will cause problems at lower flows. Fish and wildlife will be affected by water <br />li <br /> qua <br />ty exceedences. <br /> <br />- Response: In general, reoperation of Navajo Reservoir would affect water quality by <br /> either the addition or reduction of high-quality reservoir water released to the river. When <br />l <br /> re <br />eases are lowered, the river has less ability to dilute pollutants. Water quality concerns <br />• are related to these low releases. <br /> For a more detailed water quality assessment of the Basin, refer to the water quality <br /> assessments and resource reports written for the ALP Project, SJRBRIP, and NIIP. These <br />- projects have included studies of the San Juan River water quality and the impacts to the <br />• San Juan River in detail. In addition, the U.S. Geological Survey (GS) has completed several <br /> reports on the water quality conditions in the Basin. <br />s <br />- At the present time, water releases from dams are not regulated as pollution point sources. <br />- Under the Clean Water Act, the State of New Mexico assesses water quality within the State <br /> every 2 years and reports it to the EPA (this document is commonly referred to as a <br /> Section 305(b) report). This report includes the degree of use support, causes (pollutants <br />- and other stressors), and sources of impairment. If a reach of river is impaired, then it is <br />- placed on the State's list of water quality-limited waters requiring TMDL, commonly <br /> referred to as the Section 303(d) list. For the San Juan River, several reaches are on the <br /> Section 303(d) list, and the State is in the process of evaluating these reaches as well as the <br />- entire Basin within New Mexico. <br />Reclamation has supplied the State with its sample results as well as other water quality <br />documents. If reaches are found to be impaired and TMDL are determined, sources of