My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9582
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9582
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:49:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9582
Author
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
Title
Final Environmental Impact Statement - Navajo Reservoir Operations Volume III Comments and Responses.
USFW Year
2006.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction - Durango, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
608
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Volume III - Comments and Responses <br />FENS - Navajo Reservoir Operations <br />suggested that contaminants would not limit the recovery of the two endangered fish <br />species." Studies continue on the San Juan River to monitor water quality conditions and <br />their relationship to the health of the endangered fish. <br />- Reduced releases from Navajo Reservoir will not "add" pollution, but will cause an increase <br />in the concentration of some water quality parameters due to the reduction of good quality <br />water released from the reservoir. The area of most concern, identified in San Juan River <br />low flow tests, is the reach of river between Navajo Dam and Farmington. As seen in the <br />low flow tests, this reach had changing concentrations of several parameters, like <br />temperature, dissolved oxygen, and salinity, which are directly related to changes in flow. <br />Several other parameters also exceeded New Mexico's water quality standards, but the <br />majority of parameters remained within the standards. Historic data indicate some <br />- parameters occasionally exceeded State standards in this reach. <br /> The reach of the San Juan River below Farmington-the reach occupied by the endangered <br />• fish-should not experience a decrease in minimum flows, but an increase in base <br />- (minimum) flows through most of the year due to the requirement for a base flow between <br /> 500 and 1,000 cfs for the endangered fish. Based on historic water quality data, these flows <br /> will keep most water quality parameters above the States' and Tribes' water quality <br />- standards. Historic data indicate some water quality standards have been exceeded in the <br />- past, and this trend will likely occur in the future, but it is not anticipated to be significantly <br /> greater than the historic records. <br /> <br />- For additional water quality issue responses, see General Comment No. 23. <br /> General Comment 21: Several comments were received on the validity of the baseline <br /> (existing depletion estimations) used in the DEIS analysis. <br />- <br /> (a) The RiverWare Hydrology Model contains a number of errors. The RiverWare <br /> model is currently under review by the SJRBRIP and others; Reclamation should <br /> respond to model improvements through adaptive management, etc. <br /> <br />- Response: RiverWare was the simulation model selected for use in this analysis. It has <br /> been implemented in the Basin since 1998 in support of assessing the relationship between <br /> flow recommendations for endangered fish in the San Juan River and water development. <br />- The model, in its present configuration, represents the best science available to assess the <br />- impacts of water development on the ability to meet Flow Recommendations for the <br /> endangered fish and to test operating rules designed for that purpose. The presently <br /> defined operating rules and model configuration do not indicate availability for substantial <br />- additional depletions in the Basin with the present Flow Recommendations. Future water <br />- development is addressed in chapter II, "VII. Preferred Alternative," of the FEIS. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.