Laserfiche WebLink
<br />64 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />eliminated, the long period of maximum powerplant flows <br />under current operations. The resulting amount of sand <br />stored in the main channel would be less than under <br />current operations, making beaches more vulnerable to <br />erosion. Also, the change each year from low to high <br />flows would produce unstable beaches, and might result <br />in a higher rate of erosion than under current condi- <br />tions (See Appendix A, section V.) <br /> <br />Terrestrial vegetation and wildlife both would benefit <br />under the chub scenario when compared to current <br />operations, which include flooding. The major <br />long-term benefit to vegetation would be protection <br />from physical removal and substrate loss similar to <br />that which occurred following the flood releases in <br />1983, 1984, 1985, and 1986. However, possible <br />long-term loss of beaches could lead to some loss of <br />vegetation and wildlife populations. <br /> <br />Releases For COMMON NATIVE FISH Have Strong <br />Negative Effects On White-water Boating <br /> <br />The common native fish scenario (Figure VII-2) is based <br />on the evidence that the largest number of backwaters <br />are available at relatively low flows (5,000 cfs). <br />Therefore, low flows from June to August would increase <br />the availability of backwater habitats during the <br />vulnerable rearing period over those available under <br />current operations. The remaining water is evenly dis- <br />tributed from September through May. Preliminary <br />research has shown that flows of 5,000 cfs can triple <br />the number of available backwaters compared to flows of <br />28,000 cfs (Appendis B, Section V). It is possible <br />that a similar number of backwaters would be available <br />under flows higher than 5,000 cfs. Additional surveys <br />of backwater numbers at different flow levels are <br />needed to refine this scenario. <br /> <br />The number of backwaters is increased if low flows are <br />preceded by steady flows because sandbars deposited in <br />eddies show more topographic relief under these <br />conditions and more backwaters form when flows are <br />dropped (Appendix A, section II). Fluctuations <br />continually change the depth, temperature, and velocity <br />of backwaters, forcing larval fish to either move into <br />the mainstem river or be stranded and die. <br />