My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7387
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7387
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:43:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7387
Author
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
Title
Glen Canyon Environmental Studies Executive Summaries of Technical Reports.
USFW Year
1988.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
410
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />the Colorado River significantly aggraded the channel <br />and deposited sediments that probably caused larger <br />debris flows to reach the river. <br /> <br />The debris flow of December 1966 began with 11 slope <br />failures in the Hermit Shale and Supai Group and <br />traveled 13 miles to the Colorado River. Calculated <br />flow velocity ranged from 10-18 ft/s, and the discharge <br />ranged from 9,200- 14,000 cfs. Water content of the <br />debris flow ranged from 24-33 percent, and sand content <br />from 10-15 percent. One boulder transported by the <br />flow weighed an estimated 47 tons, and boulders with <br />diameters in excess of 5 ft were common. Upon reaching <br />the Colorado River, the debris flow created a new fan <br />surface that significantly constricted the Colorado <br />River (Kieffer 1985). <br /> <br />DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />Similarities among the three debris flows studied are <br />indicative of the cause and nature of debris flows in <br />Grand Canyon National Park. All three flows were <br />initiated as slope failures in the Hermit Shale and <br />Supai Group, especially the Esplanade Sandstone. All <br />debris flows transported a poorly sorted mixture of <br />clay- to boulder-size particles wi th water contents <br />that ranged from 23-33 percent by volume. The largest <br />boulders transported ranged from 9 tons in the <br />Lava-Chuar Creek drainage to 37 and 47 tons in the <br />Monument Creek and Crystal Creek drainages, respective- <br />ly. Two of the three debris flows significantly <br />constricted the Colorado River at the tributary mouths. <br />The frequency of debris flows reaching the Colorado <br />River is tentative; however, available data suggest <br />that one debris flow reaches the Colorado River every <br />20-50 years in these drainages. A compilation of <br />historical information on flow events from Grand Canyon <br />tributaries, however, indicates that debris flows <br />occur more frequently throughout the park. <br /> <br />The bedrock geology of Grand Canyon National Park pro- <br />vides an ideal situation for the initiation of debris <br />flows. The high reI ief combined with differential <br />strength properties of the rocks results in a high <br />potential for slope failures. The most common source <br />of mobilized sediments for debris flows are the Hermit <br />Shale and Esplanade Sandstone. Other sources include <br />the Permian Kaibab Limestone, Toroweap Formation, and <br />Coconino Sandstone; the Cambrian Muav Limestone and <br />underlying Bright Angel Shale; and Quaternary basalts <br />in the western Grand Canyon. Dispersive and swelling <br /> <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.