My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4000
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
4000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:42:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
4000
Author
U.S. Department of the Interior.
Title
Report on Water For Energy in the Upper Colorado River Basin.
USFW Year
1974.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />(2) Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming, after deduction <br />of Arizona's 50,000 acre-feet: Colorado, 51.75 percent, New Mexico, <br />11.25 percent, Utah, 23 percent, and Wyoming, 14 percent. <br /> <br />Article III(b)3 provides that no state shall exceed its apportioned <br />use in any year when such use deprives another state of its water during <br />that year. Curtailment in use of water apportioned is to be determined <br />by the Commission. The Commission is to determine and allocate <br />losses of water as a result of reservoir storage. The Upper Colorado <br />River Commission is created as an interstate administrative agency <br />and its duties are defined by Article VIII of the Compact. The <br />Compact is not to interfere with the right or power of any state <br />to regulate within its boundaries the appropriation, use, and control <br />of water apportioned to such state. The failure of any state to use <br />water s hall not constitute a relinquishment or a forfeiture of the <br />right to use that water. Article XIX provides that the obligation <br />of the United States to the Indian tribes, the Mexican Treaty or <br />any rights of the United States to acquire waters in the Upper <br />Colorado River System are not to be affected. <br /> <br />The Boulder Canyon Project Act has been interpreted by the Supreme <br />Court of the United States in litigation involving Lower Basin <br />States. In Arizona v. California, 377 U.S. 546 (1963), the Supreme <br />Court ruled that "Congress, in passing the Boulder Canyon Project <br />Act," intended to and did create its own comprehensive scheme for <br />apportionment among the three Lower Basin States of the water of <br />the Colorado River. The Court also stated that, "while the Secretary <br />must follow the standards set out in the Act, he, nevertheless, is <br />free to choose among the recognized methods of apportionment or to <br />devise reasonable methods of his own." <br /> <br />The Colorado River Storage Project Act of April 11, 1956 (75 Stat. <br />105) provides for the development of the resources of the Upper <br />Basin and makes it possible for the Upper Basin States to use their <br />apportionment. The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to <br />construct the initial storage units for mainstem regulation and to <br />construct certain participating projects in the Upper Basin States. <br />The Act requires in the operation and maintenance of all facilities <br />under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior in the basin <br />of the Colorado River, that the Secretary comply with the Colorado <br />River Compact, the Upper Colorado River Basin Compact, the Boulder <br />Canyon Project Act, the Boulder Canyon Project Adjustment Act, and <br />the Treaty with the United Mexican States. The Act has been amended <br />on several occasions to authorize the construction of additional <br />participating projects and alter the schedule of investigation of <br />future projects. <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.