Laserfiche WebLink
<br />V. AUGMENTATION AND WATER MANAGEMENT POTENTIALS <br /> <br />Present and anticipated future demands on the waters of the Colorado River <br />~equire a look at alternative sources of water through either development <br />of new sources or a reallocation of use. Augmenting the flows of the river <br />through one or a variety of means would increase the water supply and permit <br />continued growth of water dependent developments. The concept of augmentation <br />can be physically applied from within the Upper Basin; in the Lower Basin <br />in conjunction with an exchange of water; or a combination of these factors. <br />In accordance with provisions of the 1968 Colorado River Project Act, new <br />water supplies developed through augmentation will first go to meet the <br />Mexican Water Treaty obligation. <br /> <br />Indications are that weather modification can be made operational in the <br />Upper Colorado River Basin to provide a new water supply for beneficial use <br />throughout the Basin. Current estimates are that. the water supply of the <br />Colorado River could be increased by 0.9 to 1.3 million acre-feet annually <br />through weather modification. For the Upper Colorado River Basin, the <br />potential increase in annual water yield could be from 6 to 9 percent, a <br />major contribution in meeting future water demands. This new water would <br />be extremely low-cost water, presently estimated at $2.50 per acre-foot, <br />and this is of great importance to the water constrained Colorado River <br />Basin. There are, however, significant adverse environmental effects that <br />will require careful evaluation and resolution. <br /> <br />Development of geothermal resources in the Lower Colorado River Basin offers <br />a potential for production of desalted water to augment the flows of the <br />Colorado River and thus, through an exchange program, provide for the <br />retainment and use of more water in the Upper Basin. Development of water <br />from geothermal brines must be viewed in joint context with the development <br />of geothermal power whereby the economics of joint development can be <br />obtained to bring the cost of water down to acceptable levels. Because <br />the geothermal resource lies under more than 2 million acres in the Imperial <br />Valley of California, recovery of large blocks of power and water may have <br />some formidable physical constraints. Smaller blocks of up to 100,000 AF <br />might be developed with lesser constraints or detrimental effects. Expected <br />costs of producing and delivering about 2.5 million acre-feet of desalted <br />water to the Colorado River would range from $100 to $150 per acre-foot. <br /> <br />A dual purpose sea water nuclear desalting plant on the Gulf or Pacific <br />Ocean could also be considered to provide a water supply for augmenting <br />the Colorado River through an exchange program. This would be relatively <br />expensive water which the energy industrial complex could purchase when <br />cheaper water supplies are not available. These Lower Basin augmentation <br />potentials could be developed to meet that region's demands on the Colorado <br />River; thus allowing the Upper Basin to retain additional amounts of the <br />River's natural water supply for its use. A combination of weather <br />modification, development of geothermal resources, and a dual-purpose <br />nuclear power sea water desalting plant offers potential for a compatible <br />system of water and energy development in the Colorado River Basin. <br /> <br />58 <br />