Laserfiche WebLink
<br />under Section S.d of the Act. Also, under the National Environmental <br />Policy Act, Federal agencies must consider alternative uses of a <br />river. Further, the approved Principles and Standards required not <br />only that conventional water development projects be formulated and <br />evaluated in terms of both economic and environmental objectives, <br />but also that wild and scenic river studies he done in like manner <br />A primary recommendation of the Nationwide Outdoor Recreation Plan <br />is that the Department of the Interior will complete a program of <br />identification and selection and a plan for acquisition of those <br />areas needed for the Federal recreation estage. To this end, <br />committees of concerned Federal representatives have been formed <br />at both the Washington and Regional levels to review and develop <br />criteria which rivers must meet to qualify for inclusion within <br />the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System with administration by <br />a Federal agency and criteria for rivers to be included in the <br />National System, with administration by a non-Federal agency. <br /> <br />An effort has been made to compile lists of rivers and streams that <br />had been recommended in proposed legislation or in offical reports <br />and correspondence as suitable for preservation. From this effort <br />it appears that virtually every major and most minor rivers in the <br />West have at one time or another been identified by someone as <br />having free-flowing values. Regardless of whether or not a river <br />will qualify for addition to the National system of wild rivers, <br />they are important as part of the recreation resource base. The <br />combination of widespread general interest and the intent of the <br />aforementioned laws and policies makes it imperative that information <br />on the potential of all rivers be obtained and considered before <br />projects are approved that will alter their present characteristics. <br /> <br />Existing Water Rights - Each Upper Basin State recognizes the <br />diversion of water for beneficial uses as a cornerstone of the <br />appropriation doctrine. The methodology of ac~uiring a water <br />right is different in each state. Most direct flow rights are <br />issued for a rate of diversion, usually measured in cibic feet <br />per second. Reservoir capacity measured in acre-feet is the usual <br />unit for storage rights. Diversion for agricultural use is generally <br />limited to the growing season. Other uses are not so limited. The <br />total amount in acre-feet diverted under a direct flow rate varies <br />by year, place, elevation, and sta.te. Computations to convert the <br />amount diverted in cubic feet per second to the amount of depletion <br />of a source in acre-feet are very difficult because one must con- <br />sider, among other things, kind of use, temperature, hydrology, <br />elevation, percolation, surface flow, etc. <br /> <br />Streams in the Upper Basin generally have high flows in the spring (May, <br />June, and early July) and a restricted flow the rest of the year. Many <br /> <br />26 <br />