Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EFFECTS OF WA TER QUALITY ON WA TER USERS 17 <br /> <br />as the Colorado-Big Thompson, Duchesne <br />Tunnel, Roberts Tunnel and more recent <br />projects increased exports to about 727,000 acre- <br />feet per year for 1976-80, with a peak in 1978 of <br />852,000 acre-feet. <br /> <br />EFFECTS OF WATER QUALITY <br />ON WATER USERS <br /> <br />Recreation, Asthetics, and <br />Fisheries <br /> <br />The mlijor instream uses in the Colorado River <br />include hydroelectric power, propagation of fish <br />and aquatic life, recreation (including <br />swimming, waterskiing, boating, rafting, etc.), <br />and esthetics. A number of conflicts among <br />water uses have become prominent issues in <br />recent years. <br /> <br /> <br />Many tradeoffs exist in water quality, <br />eutrophication, and esthetics, both in a reservoir <br />and downstream, depending on the depth of <br />reservoir withdrawal and the flushing rate. The <br />depth of withdrawal influences the temperature <br />and nutrient releases from a reservoir. These <br />releases can now be controlled to some degree by <br />the use of selective withdrawal structures; <br />however, conflicts have occurred in the operation <br />of these facilities. The conflict stems from the <br />difference in the optimum temperatures for cold <br />water fish like trout and wann water endemic or <br />endangered species like the squawfish. <br /> <br />In addition to downstream effects, the depth of <br />withdrawal in reservoirs has become a <br />significant issue concerning the productivity of <br />reservoir fisheries, eutrophication, nutrient <br />retention, salinity routing, esthetics, and <br />evaporation.[5] At present, concerns exist about <br />evaporation, temperature, and nutrient <br />processes in Fontenelle and Flaming Gorge <br />Rest: rvoirs, Lake Powell, and Lake Mead. <br /> <br />Economic <br /> <br />In the Lower Basin, present peak salinity is <br />approaching critical levels for some salt <br />sensitive crops. While the water is suitable for <br />irrigating most crops, salinity is high enough <br /> <br />that special irrigation practices are necessary in <br />some cases. At the present time, salinity is <br />being maintained below the standards. <br />Complete development of apportioned water by <br />the States without salinity control measures <br />would result in increases in salinity that are <br />detrimental to agriculture. <br /> <br />A consortium of water resource centers in the <br />States of Arizona, California, Colorado, and <br />Utah cooperated in a study funded by the Office <br />of Water Research and Technology and the <br />Bureau of Reclamation to assess the economic <br />damages caused by various salt concentrations <br />to agncultural and municipal water users. This <br />study is documented in a report entitled Salinity <br />Management Options for the Colorado River, <br />Water Resources Planning Series Report <br />P-78-003, June 1978. [6] <br /> <br />Based upon the findings of that report, <br />Reclamation has published a summary working <br />document entitled Colorado River <br />Salinity-Economic Impacts on Agricultural, <br />Municipal, and Industrial Users. [7] The <br />estimated future annual damages to the Lower <br />Basin water users in 1976 dollars were $343,000 <br />for each 1 milligram per liter (mg/L) increase in <br />total dissolved solids (TDS) at Imperial Dam <br />when concentrations reach the range of <br />875 mg/L to 1,225 mg/L. The damage figure is <br />approximately $610,200 per mg/L in 1986 <br />dollars. These annual damages were calculated <br />using the 1972 salinity standard of 879 mgIL <br />(approved by EPAin 1975) and a projected <br />full development salinity concentration of <br />1,225 mg/L at Imperial Dam. <br /> <br />The annual municipal.damages are divided as <br />follows: Metropolitan Water District, 54 percent; <br />Central Arizona Project, 8 percent; and lower <br />main stem users, 8 percent. Total agriculture <br />annual damages are 30 percent. Industrial <br />impairments and Upper Basin damages were <br />not evaluated. <br /> <br />Estimating Economic Impacts of Salinity of the <br />Colorado River [33] summarizes findings from a <br />study designed to develop a method of <br />forecasting economic impacts of salinity of the <br />Colorado River upon various users in the <br />southwestern United States. One objective was <br />to update, revise, clarify, and refine the <br />