My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:39:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
2003
Author
U.S. Department of the Interior.
Title
Quality of Water, Colorado River Basin.
USFW Year
1985.
USFW - Doc Type
Progress Report No. 12,
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
231
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PART VI <br /> <br />FUTURE DEVELOPMENT <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />n. White River Dam <br /> <br />Evaporation from the White River Reservoir is estimated <br />to be 5,500 acre-feet, rounded to 6,000 acre-feet. It was assumed that <br />the dam will be in place by 1990. <br /> <br />o. Oil Shale <br /> <br />Present plannlng indicates that the White River Dam and <br />Reservoir may be capable of yielding up to 75,000 acre-feet of water <br />annually. <br /> <br />Projections of water use for the oil shale industry are <br />down considerably from projections made 2 years ago. Values shown <br />through the year 2010 were supplied by the Utah Division of Water Re- <br />sources. It should be realized that all of the projected oil shale <br />depletion values contain a high degree of uncertainty. <br /> <br />p. Tar Sands <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />In November 1983, the Bureau of Land Management issued <br />a Draft Environmental Impact Statement describing, development alterna- <br />tives for special tar sand areas in Utah. Two development alternatives <br />were presented--high commercial production and low commercial produc- <br />tion--which would result in 88,295 and 22,200 acre-feet per year of <br />depletion, respectively, by the year 2005. The Utah Division of Water <br />Resources has requested that for purposes of Table A a level of develop- <br />ment midway between the low commercial and high commercial production <br />scenarios be assumed through the year 2010, which results in the numbers <br />shown. <br /> <br />B. Lower Basin Depletions <br /> <br />Estimates of future consumptive use by Lower Basin States of main <br />stem Colorado River water were derived from (1) quantities recommended <br />by the Decree of the Supreme Court of the United States in Arizona vs. <br />California (March 9, 1964) and (2) lists of present perfected rights filed <br />with the court. Rates of development have been estimated in those cases <br />where a particular use is not yet fully developed. Certain other exist- <br />ing uses are presumed to be curtailed when the Central Arizona Project <br />becomes fully operational (assumed to be in 1988). In California, the <br />Seven Party Agreement (August 18, 1931) also serves as a basis for esti- <br />mates of future ~se within that State. <br /> <br />1. Nevada <br /> <br />a. Southern Nevada Water Project <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The Las Vegas Valley which includes the diversions to Las <br />Vegas, North Las Vegas, Henderson, and Nellis Air Force Base consumed <br />about 78,500 acre-feet of water from the Southern Nevada Water Project <br /> <br />49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.