Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PART VI <br /> <br />FUTURE DEVELOPMENT <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />considered on a deferred status until funding is provided. For planning <br />purposes an administration decision was made by the Bureau of Reclama- <br />tion to defer depletions until after 2030. <br /> <br />1. Savery-Pot Hook Project <br /> <br />The project was authorized as a participating project of <br />the Colorado River Storage Project by Public Law 88-568 on September 2, <br />1964. The authorization was based upon a Feasibility Report prepared in <br />1962. A Definite Plan Report was prepared in June 1971, revised in <br />January 1972, and updated by an Advance Definite Plan Report dated May <br />1977. Stream depletions in the 1977 report are 11,900 acre-feet for <br />Colorado and 10,500 acre-feet for Wyoming. The President's Water <br />Project Review in 1977 resulted in deletion of funding for the project, <br />and no construction funding has been provided. The project was not de- <br />authorized. It is, therefore, considered on a deferred status until <br />funding is provided. For planning purposes an administrative decision <br />was made by the Bureau of Reclamation to defer depletions until after <br />2030. <br /> <br />m. San Miguel Project <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />A Feasibility Report was prepared in 1966, and the proj- <br />ect was authorized as a participating project of the Colorado River <br />Storage Project by the Colorado River Basin Project Act (Public Law <br />90-537) on September 30, 1968. Advance planning studies have continued <br />and various plans have been considered, but none is feasible based upon <br />current policies and procedures for planning water and related land <br />resources. A wide array of development plans has been investigated <br />including a mix of agricultural, municipal, and industrial uses. A <br />Concluding Report has been prepared summarizing data available. This <br />included. data from a large acreage alternative, a small acreage alter- <br />native, and a conservation alternative. Figures for depletion were <br />selected from the small acreage alternative which included depletions of <br />12,000 acre-feet for irrigation, l2,000 acre-feet for industrial use, <br />and 1,000 acre-feet for municipal use. For planning purposes, an admin- <br />istrative decision was made by the Bureau of Reclamation to defer deple- <br />tions until after 2030. <br /> <br />n. Upper Gunnison River Basin Projects <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Water rights with a priority date of November 13, 1957, <br />for the Wayne N. Aspinall Unit (formerly Curecanti Unit) of the Colorado <br />River Storage Project were granted by the State of Colorado to the <br />Colorado River Water Conservation District. These rights were assigned <br />by the district to the United States in January 1962 subject to the con- <br />dition that the unit would be developed and operated in a manner con- <br />sistent with beneficial use of the waters in the Gunnison River Basin. <br />In order that future developments in the Upper Gunnison Basin would be <br />assured of rights to use of water, a formal contract was developed for <br />execution among the United States Government, the Upper Gunnison River <br />Water Conservancy District, and water users in the Upper Basin whereby <br />the diversion and storage rights of the Aspinall Unit were subordinated <br /> <br />42 <br />