Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PART IV <br /> <br />COLORADO RIVER WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />State standards are concerned, but the program has helped identify some <br />areas of concern. <br /> <br />There is some concern about secondary drinking water quality <br />criteria. The Colorado main stem is high in dissolved salts, <br />particularly sulfates. At Parker Dam, average concentrations <br />of sulfates and TDS exceed the U.S. Public Health Service <br />drinking water recommendations. <br /> <br />The threat of trihalomethane production when Colorado River <br />water is chlorinated may require changes in the treatment proc- <br />ess for the drinking water systems within Arizona, which plan <br />to utilize Colorado River water. <br /> <br />Another area of concern is the high levels of fecal coliform <br />bacteria found in some areas along the river. The high bacte- <br />rial levels were probably caused by high river flows which <br />caused the overflow of septic tanks. Although this situation <br />may only be temporary, there is concern that sewage disposal <br />problems will increase as development and recreation increase. <br /> <br />E. Nevada <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The Colorado River met water quality standards, provided for pro- <br />tection and propagation of fish and wildllfe, and allowed recreational <br />activities in and on the water. The high water level in Lake Mead con- <br />tinues to contribute to improved water quality by diluting the high <br />pollutant loads entering Lake Mead via Las Vegas Wash. Since July 1981, <br />the municipal dischargers in the Las Vegas area have installed chemi- <br />c~l addition, reducing the phosphate load to the wash by 90 percent. <br />Attainment of this phosphate reduction has resulted in the associated <br />reduction of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and suspended solids <br />loading from these municipal sources to the wash and the lake. Monitor- <br />lng conducted during 1983 indicated high concentration of chlorophyll-a <br />in the inner Las Vegas Bay despite cutbacks in the phosphorus loading. <br />The Virgin River, a tributary to Lake Mead, exhibited poor water quality <br />in terms of bacteria, esthetics, and solids, and very minimal fish life. <br /> <br />Phosphorus is of concern, chiefly, with respect to present and <br />future domestic use and, secondarily, with respect to recreation and <br />fisheries. Studies have indicated that in-lake concentrations greater <br />than 0.013 mg/L as phosphorus will produce algae concentrations which <br />will have adverse. effects on recreation, whereas other studies have im- <br />plied that more phosphorus is necessary for fisheries. In view of this, <br />Nevada adopted and implemented the requirements of no more than 1 mg/L <br />as phosphorus for all point sources. The major point sources are the <br />three large municipal facilities along the Las Vegas Wash. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />TDS, hardness, sulfates, and chlorides are of concern with respect <br />to domestic use of water from Lake Mead. The present levels appear to <br />be accepted by the public, although an economic impact is felt as a <br /> <br />20 <br />