My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:39:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
2003
Author
U.S. Department of the Interior.
Title
Quality of Water, Colorado River Basin.
USFW Year
1985.
USFW - Doc Type
Progress Report No. 12,
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
231
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PART III <br /> <br />CAUSES AND IMPACTS OF SALINITY <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Assuming a yield of 5.8 million acre-feet for the Upper Basin, this <br />leaves approximately 1.8 million acre-feet to be developed. <br /> <br />Consumptive use of water for irrigation within the basin and ex- <br />ports from the basin were responsible for the largest depletions of <br />the Colorado River, while reservoir evaporation and municipal and indus- <br />trial uses account for a lesser depletion. <br /> <br />River <br /> <br />Acre-feet <br />2,114 <br />3,473 <br />271 <br />50 <br />3,525 <br />2,847 <br />12,280 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The major part of the transbasin depletions in the Upper Basin is <br />made at higher elevations where the salinity concentrations are very <br />low. This removal of high quality water results in the remaining flows <br />downstream becoming more concentrated even though some salts are removed <br />by the water delivered to another basin. Many transbasin diversions <br />have been made over the years and an additional number will occur in <br />the future. <br /> <br />Water exported from the Upper Basin during the period 1941-72 aver- <br />aged about 360,000 acre-feet per year. Completion of such large proj- <br />ects as the Colorado-Big Thompson, Duchesne Tunnel, and Roberts Tunnel <br />and more recent projects such as the San Juan-Chama, Fryingpan-Arkansas, <br />and Homestake resulted in increased exports to about 726,000 acre-feet <br />per year for 1976-80, with a peak in 1978 of 852,000 acre-feet. <br /> <br />C. Effects of Water Quality on Water Users <br /> <br />I. Recreation, Esthetics, and Fisheries <br /> <br />The major instream uses in the Colorado River include hydro- <br />electric power, propagation of fish and aquatic life, recreation (in- <br />cluding swimming, water skiing, boating, rafting, etc.), and esthetics. <br />A number of conflicts between water uses have become prominent issues in <br />recent years. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />There can be many tradeoffs in water quality, eutrophication, <br />and esthetics both in the reservoir and downstream, depending on the <br />depth of reservoir withdrawal and the flushing rate. The depth of with- <br />drawal impacts the temperature and nutrient releases from a reservoir. <br />These releases can now be controlled by the use of selective withdrawal <br />structures; however, the optimum temperatures for cold water sport <br /> <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.