Laserfiche WebLink
18 <br />Table 8. Ranking of NPMP stations in order of decreasing geometric mean concentrations of residues of selected compounds <br />for the collection periods 1976-77 and 1978-79. See Fig. 1 for locations of stations. <br /> 1976-77 1978-79 1976-77 1978-79 1976-77 1978-79 <br /> Station Station Station Station Station Station <br />Rank No. Mean No. Mean No. Mean No. Mean No. Mean No. Mean <br /> p,p'-DDE p,p'- DDT EDDTa <br />1 104 2.94 80 5.02 104 1.12 80 0.80 80 4.70 80 7.64 <br />2 80 2.42 16 2.31 80 0.92 14 0.52 104 4.47 16 2.58 <br />3 21 1.93 28 1.49 21 0.50 115 0.39 21 2.66 105 1.97 <br />4 16 1.67 105 1.35 115 0.42 100 0.17 16 1.78 28 1.88 <br />5 105 1.20 4 1.31 14 0.29 99 0.17 105 1.56 14 1.72 <br />6 107 1.01 14 1.14 22 0.22 81 0.16 14 1.42 4 1.65 <br />7 14 0.93 21 1.05 105 0.19 105 0.15 107 1.38 71 1.63 <br />8 4 0.89 104 0.90 9 0.18 104 0.15 4 1.16 21 1.48 <br />9 9 0.73 71 0.85 55 0.17 30 0.14 115 1.09 115 1.38 <br />10 48 0.70 115 0.83 33 0.15 21 0.14 44 0.96 104 1.24 <br />Median - 0.16 - 0.15 - 0.01 - 0.02 - 0.20 - 0.24 <br />----- ------ ------------ <br />EPCBb ----- ------ ----------- <br />Toxaphene ------ ------ ----- <br />Diel ------ <br />drinc ----- <br />1 3 33.9 3 44.1 80 8.73 80 12.97 100 1.22 100 1.48 <br />2 69 6.0 2 11.0 104 7.21 105 4.33 90 0.94 105 0.57 <br />3 54 5.2 24 6.4 21 4.96 102 4.25 105 0.49 104 0.42 <br />4 107 5.1 69 5.9 22 3.52 104 3.86 104 0.39 21 0.35 <br />5 21 5.0 54 5.3 105 2.91 21 3.62 21 0.31 83 0.30 <br />6 2 5.0 107 4.8 102 2.90 83 1.92 73 0.24 31 0.20 <br />7 111 4.5 105 4.7 76 2.82 81 1.73 26 0.22 26 0.18 <br />8 105 4.3 23 4.4 103 2.12 71 1.63 68 0.16 75 0.18 <br />9 18 4.2 20 3.4 14 2.04 59 1.44 15 0.14 68 0.15 <br />10 24 3.9 21 3.2 9 1.79 30 1.35 69 0.12 89 0.14 <br />Median - 0.5 - 0.5 - <0.01 - 0.13 - 0.01 - 0.02 <br />aSum of p,p'-homologs. <br />bAroclors 1248, 1254, and 1260. <br />Includes aldrin for 1976-77. <br />industrialized regions of the Northeast and Midwest (Ta- <br />ble 8). Significant PCB residues (>-1.0 µg/g wet weight) <br />were typical of fish from most waters contiguous to major <br />population centers. Trace concentrations of the more per- <br />sistent, highly chlorinated residues continued to be detected <br />in fish from almost every major river in the United States. <br />The ubiquity of PCB iesidues probably results from atmos- <br />pheric transport, from the dispersal of contaminated sedi- <br />ment, and from patterns of continued use and disposal. <br />Cyclodiene Insecticides <br />Of the cyclodiene insecticides, aldrin and dieldrin have <br />received the most notoriety. Nationally, mean dieldrin resi- <br />dues have historically been low (< 1.0 µg1 g wet weight), <br />compared with residues of DDT and PCB's. Nevertheless, <br />ANOVA revealed a statistically significant, albeit small, <br />downward trend in mean dieldrin residues after 1974 <br />(Tables 6 and 7). Analysis of covariance showed significant <br />declines at eight stations and increases at three stations <br />during this period (Table 7). However, there was no signifi- <br />cant change from 1976-77 to 1978-79 (Tables 6 and 7). <br />Levels were relatively low (<0.2 µg/g) at the stations <br />showing increases; levels were much higher at many of the <br />stations with declining residues. Among the group show- <br />ing declines were stations in the Corn Belt (26, 68, 69, and <br />83) and in Hawaii (99 and 100). As in 1974, dieldrin resi- <br />dues were highest in fish from Hawaii (station 100), from <br />Lake Michigan (stations 104, 105, and 21), and from the <br />major rivers in the Midwest (Table 8). At station 76 (Mis- <br />sissippi River at Memphis, Tennessee), elevated levels of <br />dieldrin, endrin, and other cyclodiene compounds before <br />1975 were attributed to the presence of a pesticide manu- <br />facturing facility (Schmitt et al. 1981). However, dieldrin <br />residues at this station ranked only 11th highest in both <br />1976-77 and 1978-79 (Table 8), and residues in fish declined <br />significantly after 1974 (Table 7). Because aldrin is rapidly <br />metabolized to dieldrin (Schnoor 1981), residues are seldom