Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />or under-feed young fry. Generally speaking, the condition of the fish and the rearing container will <br />indicate if over- or under-feeding is occurring. Underfeeding is evident in poor growth (or starvation <br />if{fish have not been properly trained to feed). Overfeeding results in excess feed fouling the rearing <br />container and water quality, jeopardizingnsh health. <br /> <br />Once pikeminnow fry have reached 2 inches in size, they are large enough to withstand <br />sampling stress. Fish were weighed and measured monthly, and the data was used to determine the <br />appropriate amount offeed to be fed daily. Feed charts (daily feed rations) were calculated using a <br />modification of Haskell's equation by Buterbaugh and Willoughby (1967). A hatchery constant of <br />6 and a condition factor of 0.00025 was used in this equation. Monitor fish condition by using <br />growth rates, feed conversions, and visual inspections of the fish at sampling times. Adjust the <br />hatchery constant or condition factor from recorded data if there is a problem with the generalized <br />values given above. These measured rations may be hand-fed six to eight times per day, or fed <br />constantly by automated feeders. <br /> <br />Feeding Methods <br />An evaluation between hand feeding and the Zeigler 12-hour belt feeder (Zeigler Brothers, <br />Gardner, Pennsylvania) was performed. Study protocol (tank size, location, water flow, fish size, <br />etc.) was similar for hand-fed and belt-fed fish. The feeders were filled first thing each morning. The <br />feed was distributed evenly on the belt so that it fed continuously over a 12-hour period. The fish <br />being hand-fed were given feed six times over a six- to eight.hour period. Growth was evaluated by <br />using feed conversions and specific growth rates. <br /> <br />There were no significant differences in growth or survival between the two methods. There <br />were behavioral differences in the fish's response to feeding and fright. Hand-fed fish became <br />accustomed to feeding and the foot traffic near their tank. 'They eventually lost all fright response and <br />became aggressive to hand feeding. These feeding frenzies would dramatically decrease oxygen levels <br />in those tanks. <br /> <br />Fish fed by belt feeders had a dramatic fright response to any disturbance throughout the <br />study. These fish never became accustomed to daily routines, such as filling feeders or cleaning tanks. <br />Oxygen levels for tanks with belt feeders did not have the dramatic ups and downs as with hand <br />feeding. Hand feeding is recommended for fish that are to be held for captive brood stock. Fish to <br />be introduced back into the wild should be put on belt feeders as soon as possible to help maintain <br />fright response. <br /> <br />HATCHERY OPERATIONS (CULTURlNG TECHNIQUES) <br /> <br />PRODUCTION <br /> <br />Growth Rates <br />Like most fish, pikeminnow' growth varied greatly, depending on water temperature, <br />culturing techniques, and feed. Under the optimum condition (700 F), and using the best-known <br /> <br />13 <br />