My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9338
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9338
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:39:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9338
Author
Schler, P. J.
Title
Colorado Pikeminnow Culture Manual.
USFW Year
2001.
USFW - Doc Type
FY92-37,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />bubble action does not move the eggs. <br /> <br />DISINFECTION <br /> <br />All eggs were disinfected in 100 ppm Wescodyne (1.0-1.6% iodine) for 10 minutes at a pH <br />of 7.8. Eggs were completely rinsed after treatment. <br /> <br />MEASUREMENTS AND ENUMERATIONS <br /> <br />Gravimetric Method <br />Use standard procedures as with any species. <br /> <br />Volumetric Method <br />Use standard procedures as with any species. <br /> <br />Mechanical-J ensorter <br />A commercial fly counter (Jensorter FCI, Jensorter Inc., Bend, Oregon) designed for counting <br />walleye and yellow perch fry was experimented with at the FRH for adaptation to counting <br />pikeminnow eggs and fly. Eggs and fly were placed in a water-filled hopper and graVity-fed through <br />eight tubes which directed them past eight individual photoelectric cells where each egg or fry was <br />counted. A total count was displayed on a digital readout. A flow of fresh water was supplied to the <br />hopper to keep the water level and flow constant. After passing through the counter, eggs and fry <br />were collected in a container below the counter. <br /> <br />The counter is extremely sensitive and counts any small particle ( ie: air bubbles, egg <br />membranes, and sand particles) that can pass from the hopper thru a small hole to the photoelectric <br />cell. Adjusting the photoelectric cells to just count pikeminnow eggs was very time-consuming and <br />involved a lot of handling of eggs (each cell is adjusted individually for sensitivity). Even though the <br />eggs were submerged in water, they stuck to the side of the hopper and required constant probing <br />to force them through the eye to be counted. This can cause damage to the eggs. Hand counts of <br />eggs were within 1.2 percent of counts by the Jensorter. <br /> <br />Comparisons made between hand counts and the Jensorter showed a difference of7.6 percent <br />for swim-up fry and 3.7 percent for 21-day-old fry. In most trials, the sorter 'had the higher count. <br />This was attributed to the extreme sensitivity of the machine and, in all likelihood, counting things . <br />like' air bubbles. The system worked very well when there was a high density of fry in the hopper. <br />As the numbers became less in the hopper, it was more difficult and time-consuming to get the <br />remaining few through the system. <br /> <br />Due to damaging and detrimental effects on eggs and swim-up fry, it is recommended using <br />this kind of counter only with fry that were 21 days or older. <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.