Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Observed surface ice and mean daily river temperatures and minimum daily air temperatures <br />recorded near Jensen, Utah for winters 1986-87 and 1987-88 (Figure 6) are shown for comparison <br />between the relatively mild winters of this study and a colder winter, such as 1987-88, when surface <br />ice persisted from mid-December to mid-February. <br /> <br />Backwater Suitability <br /> <br />Of 14 backwaters selected for detailed measurements and observations in 1993-94, 10 were <br />chute channels, 3 were scour channels, and 1 was an eddy return channel (Table 3). Of the 9 <br />backwaters selected in 1994-95, 4 were chute channels, 4 were scour channels, and 1 was an eddy <br />return channel (Table 4); only the .eddy return channel persisted from the previous winter. In 1993- <br />94. 7 of the 14 backwaters surveyed (50%) were rendered unsuitable as nursery habitat by flow- <br />through caused by ice jams (4), unknown local channel changes (2), or collapsing ice lenses (1). In <br />1994-95,5 of the 9 backwaters (56%) surveyed became unsuitable because of flow-through caused <br />by ice jams (2), unknown local channel changes (1), collapsing ice lenses (1), and reduced depth <br />from ice thickness (1). <br /> <br />Direct observations confirmed that local ice jams partially dammed and elevated the river, <br />causing increased flow through four backwaters in 1993-94, including one scour channels (#3 in <br />Table 3) and three chute channels (#4, #10, #14) that eventually eroded retaining sandbars. Thi~ <br />erosion transformed these backwaters into flow-through channels, negating their value as nursery <br />backwaters. A similar phenomenon was seen in 1994-95, when 2 of the 9 backwaters observed were <br />also affected by ice jams; an eddy-return channel (#4 in Table 4) and a chute channel (#6). Hence, <br />29% and 22% of backwaters observed in 1993~94 and 1994-95, respectively, were reshaped by ice <br />jams, transforming these sheltered habitats into flow-through channels. This phenomenon occurred <br />in all three backwater formation classifications, i.e., chute, scour, and eddy-return channels. <br /> <br />Local channel changes from unknown causes also transformed 2 of 14 backwaters (14%; # 1, <br /># 12) in 1993-94 and 1 of 9 backwaters (11 %; #2) in 1994-95 into flow-through channels. Monthly <br />photographs of sand bars and backwaters in Island Park in winter of 1986-87 and 1987-88 (Valdez <br />and Masslich 1989) showed sand bars migrating and shifting substantially over a 4-month winter <br />period, and hence reshaping backwater habitats. This phenomenon may explain these local channel <br />changes. or perhaps unobserved ice jams occurred between observation periods. In addition, <br />collapsing ice lenses reduced available water depth in one backwater in 1993-94 (#5) as a result of <br />ri\'er stage changes from dam operations and two in 1994-95 (#5, #6) as a result of river stage <br />changes from local ice jams. <br /> <br />All backwaters surveyed in both years were ice-covered for much of the winter, despite the <br />absence of a complete ice cap over the mainstem Green River. In 1993-94, average ice thickness on <br />backwaters varied from 2 to 43 cm, and in 1994-95, average ice thickness varied from 3 to 40 cm <br />(Tables 5 and 6). Ice development differed longitudinally and gave characteristic features to the <br />backwaters within each of the three reaches. Detailed descriptions and maps of each backwater are <br />provided in Appendix A. <br /> <br />14 <br />