My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9586
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9586
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:35:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9586
Author
Desert Fishes Council.
Title
Proceedings of the Desert Fishes Council Volume XXVI 1994 Annual Symposium.
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
Furnace Creek, CA.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PROCEEDINGS OF THE DESERT FISHES COUNCIL, 1994 SYMPOSIUM <br />warranted but precluded finding in June of 1994. This <br />finding means that the Bull trout is warranted for <br />listing, but higher priority listing actions preclude <br />preparation of a proposed rule. This also requires that <br />the Service review the status of the species on a yearly <br />basis. It also resulted in the elevation of the Bull trout <br />from C2 to C1 candidate status. <br />The listing of the Willamette River's endemic <br />Oregon Chub, Oregonichthys crameri, was finalized in <br />mid-October of 1993. Last year's Region 1 report to <br />the Desert Fishes Council erroneously stated that a <br />decision on the listing package for the Oregon Lakes <br />tui chub, Gila bicolor oregonensis, was expected from <br />the Washington, D.C., office. The Oregon Lakes tui <br />chub has not, in fact, been petitioned for listing and <br />remains a category 2 candidate species. The Service <br />regrets any confusion caused by mixing up these two <br />similarly named species. Critical habitat for the <br />Oregon chub has not yet been proposed. <br />Consultation - The Oregon State Office <br />completed a total of 16 formal consultations on listed <br />fishes, 15 of which were non-Jeopardy biological <br />opinions. These consultations included 2 consultations <br />on 2 grazing allotments impacting Lahontan cutthroat <br />trout, Oncorhynchus clarki henshawi, 5 consultations <br />on a total of 36 grazing allotments impacting Warner <br />sucker, 4 consultations covering 11 grazing allotments <br />impacting shortnose sucker, Chasmistes brevirostris, <br />and 2 consultations covering 2 timber sales impacting <br />the shortnose sucker. The one Jeopardy biological <br />opinion was a reinitiation of the July 22, 1992, <br />biological opinion on Long Term Operations of the <br />Bureau of Reclamation's Klamath Project that focused <br />on modifications of the Bureau's actions at Clear Lake <br />Reservoir. <br />The Klamath Basin Ecosystem Restoration Office <br />(ERO) The Klamath Basin Ecosystem Office (ERO) <br />opened September 1993. The Office was established to <br />provide interagency coordination, holistic planning, <br />restoration, and outreach. ERO has had support and <br />staff from the Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of <br />Reclamation, Forest Service, and Bureau of Land <br />Management. ERO will conduct $1.5 million in <br />restoration projects for FY 94, $1.5 million in fiscal <br />year 1995 and $2.0 million in fiscal year 19 96. Initial <br />holistic planning has centered on development of <br />seamless Geographic Information System (GIS) data <br />for the basin and making data layers available to all <br />management entities. Basin wide scoping meetings <br />have been hold to identify citizen concerns. ERO is <br />unique in that it is the first national attempt to <br />holistically plan and manage an ecosystem. Other <br />national efforts center on coordination of current <br />activities. ERO's emphasis is on long range ecosystem <br />planning that will restore form and function and <br />prevent future listings. ERO's presence in the Basin <br />has sparked other conservation efforts and promoted <br />more cooperation between all entities. <br />VOLUME XXVI - published 1995 <br />NEVADA STATE OFFICE - Recovery plans for <br />endangered White River spinedace (Lepidomeda <br />albivallis), threatened Big Spring spinedace <br />(Lepidomeda mollispinis pratensis), and threatened <br />desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) were approved in <br />1994. Copies of these recovery plans are available by <br />contacting the Nevada State Office in Reno. Final <br />recovery plans for endangered Moapa dace (Moapa <br />coriacea) and threatened Lahontan cutthroat trout <br />(LCT) (Oncorhynchus clarki henshawi) have been <br />submitted for approval. The public comment period for <br />the draft Railroad Valley springfish recovery plan <br />closed in August 1994. Comments will be incorporated <br />and the final document prepared for approval by <br />March 1995. Draft recovery plans for endangered <br />Steamboat buckwheat (Eriogonum ovalifolium <br />williamsiae), threatened desert dace (Eremichthys <br />acros), and three endangered fishes in Pahranagat <br />Valley, including Pahranagat roundtail chub (Gila <br />robusta jordani), White River springfish (Crenichthys <br />baileyi baileyi), and Hiko White River springfish <br />(Crenichthys baileyi grandis, will be available for <br />public comment by late 1994. <br />In June 1994 a fire devastated the Moapa <br />National Wildlife Refuge (NWR), severely impacting <br />the endangered Moapa dace and other endemic aquatic <br />species resident in the springs and their outflow <br />streams. Immediate efforts were made to clean fire <br />debris from the streams and restore habitat structure <br />and shading to encourage recolonization by native <br />species. Subsequent surveys revealed that at least 500 <br />Moapa dace were killed during the fire. The entire <br />population numbers approximately 3,800 individuals, <br />but the refuge provided the majority of the spawning <br />habitat for this species. The status of this fish will be <br />closely monitored over the next few years. The <br />National Biological Survey has been contracted to <br />investigate the status and distribution of endemic <br />aquatic biota of the Muddy River ecosystem, which <br />includes one endangered fish, three candidate fish, and <br />four candidate invertebrates. <br />During 1994, approximately 100 wild horses <br />were removed to prevent destruction of the unique <br />aquatic and terrestrial habitats within the Ash <br />Meadows NWR. A fence will be constructed around <br />the perimeter of the refuge to prevent future movement <br />of horses from other areas into Ash Meadows. <br />Approximately 200 acres of tamarisk were treated with <br />herbicide in the Carson Slough and south of <br />Point-of-Rocks Spring in Ash Meadows NWR. <br />Conditions were ideal for the aerial application of the <br />herbicide, and refuge staff are optimistic of a <br />significant kill, although results will not be readily <br />apparent until spring 1995. A habitat management plan <br />for the threatened Ash Meadows naucorid (Ambrysus <br />amargosus) is being developed for the Fish and <br />Wildlife Service under contract. Ash Meadows NWR <br />staff are continuing to remove all interior fences and <br />7
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.