My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7998
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:34:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7998
Author
Desert Fishes Council, G. a. S., ed.).
Title
Proceedings of the Desert Fishes Council Volume XXVII, 1995 Annual Symposium.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
November, 16-19.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PROCEEDINGS OF THE DESERT FISHES COUNCIL, 1995 SYMFosium V0IUIEXXV11-PUI$ISIM 1996 <br />updating environmental legislation. The proposals have been abundant, especially at the extremes: from <br />stronger rules and enforcement, a position of ecologists and citizens, to an easement of rules, and <br />suppression of all ecological requirements in view of the economic crisis and social needs, supported by <br />industrialists and non-biologists. The social clash will be strong when the new legislative proposal is <br />processed in late 1995, or early 1996. <br />RESUMEN <br />La sequfa permanente reciente en el Noreste de Mexico ha tenido un fuerte impacto sobre los peces <br />del Desierto Chihuahuense. Varias localidades en Chihuahua han sido monitoreados desde 1963 hasta <br />finales de 198Us, reportando reducciones de comunidades de peces promediando 57.7%. Varias localidades <br />en Chihuahua y Durango fueron visitadas en mayo de 1995, encontrando los dos completamente secos: <br />Estaci6n Sauz, Rfo Florido en Jimenez, Rio Nazas cerca de Torre6n, Rfo Carmen cerca de Ahumada. Otras <br />localidades han sido convertidas en canales de denagties y no presentan peces, tales como el Rfo Chuviscar <br />en Chihuahua, y en Aldama. <br />El Gobierno Federal de Mexico organiz6 una serie de audiendas p6blicas como una base para actualizar <br />la legislad6n ambiental. Las propuestas han sido abundantes, especialmente en los extremos: desde reglas <br />fuertes y vigilancia, una posici6n de ecologistas y ciudadanos, hasta una debilidad de reglas, y una supresi6n <br />de todos los requerimientos ecol6gicos en vista de la crisis econ6mica y necesidades sociales, apoyado por <br />industriales y no-bi6logos. El conflicto social sera mas fuerte cuando la nueva propuesta legislativa sea <br />implementada a finales de 1995, o inicios de 1996. <br />CONVERSE, Y. K.*; HAWKINS, C. P.; VALDEz, R. (YKC and CFH - Department of Fisheries and WiirDife, Utah State UnWcnity, Logan tar; <br />RV - BidWest Im. Logm UT) <br />The effects of Interim Flow Management on subadult humpback chub habitat in the Colorado River <br />through Grand Canyon <br />KEYWORDS: humpback chub; subadult; geomorphology; shoreline; habitat; discharge; base flow; <br />Grand Canyon <br />ABSTRACT <br />We examined subadult (less than 200 mm TL) humpback chub Gila gpha densities along 15 miles of <br />the Colorado River in Grand Canyon to identify relationships between geomorphology, habitat use and <br />Glen Canyon Dam flow operations. We categorized shoreline habitat based on geomorphology. We then <br />measured physical habitat parameters of velocity, depth and cover along all shoreline types over the range <br />of Interim Flow Operations (8,000 to 20,000 cfs) to determine if habitat changes with discharge. <br />Although cover, depth and velocity were significantly related to subadult humpback chub presence, <br />they explained very little of the overall variation in subadult humpback chub densities. This variance may <br />be partially explained by a significant relationship of discharge with habitat quality. We found that cover <br />decreased with increasing discharge, whereas depth and velocity increased. These results suggest that <br />habitat quality decreases with increasing discharge. <br />Historically, base flows ranged from 1,000 to 5,000 cfs. Both preferred alternatives of the Glen Canyon <br />Dam Environmental Impact Statement require base flows ranging between 8,000 and 20,000, nearly an <br />order of magnitude higher than pre-dam base flows. Impacts from the reduction of peak flows have been <br />thoroughly assessed in regulated rivers; however, according to our results, artificially high base flows may <br />actually limit habitat quality in Grand Canyon. [HUBBS STUDENT PAPER COMPETITOR] <br />29
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.