My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8115
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8115
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:25:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8115
Author
Pitlick, J., M. V. Steeter and M. Franseen.
Title
Effects of Recent High Flows on Selected Reaches of the Upper Colorado River.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
Boulder, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Main Channel Cross Sections <br />Cross sections of the main channel were surveyed every 5 miles, extending from RM 185 <br />downstream to RM 130 (Fig. 1). Survey measurements in the 15-mile reach indicate relatively <br />minor changes at cross sections RM 185 and RM 175 in 1995, but what appear to be much more <br />significant changes at RM 180 (Fig. 10). We are not certain, however, that the changes at RM 180 <br />are 'real' because during the 1995 survey we were unable to find either one of the cross section <br />endpoints, and thus it was not possible to re-locate the section line exactly (at least one, if not both, <br />of the endpoints for all other sections were located, and thus these surveys are accurate within the <br />limits of the techniques). In any case, the most recent surveys of RM 185 and RM 175 indicate <br />localized scour and fill of up to 0.5 m in the channel (Fig. 10), but little change overall. <br />Measurements of cross sections in the 18-mile reach indicate similar trends: localized scour <br />and fill, but little change in morphology overall (Fig. 11). Several meters of the right bank were <br />eroded at RM 170, and about 0.5 m of sediment was eroded off the top of the bar at RM 155. <br />Otherwise, the changes observed at cross sections in this reach were minor. <br />Cross sections in Horsethief Canyon likewise exhibited localized scour and fill of up to 2 m <br />in the main channel, but generally much smaller changes (Fig. 12). No appreciable changes in <br />channel morphology occurred in this reach, largely because the river is more constrained here by <br />bedrock. The remaining two cross sections, RM 135 in Ruby Canyon and RM 130 in the alluvial <br />reach upstream of the Westwater boat launch, exhibited contrasting responses (Fig. 13). The cross <br />section at RM 135 showed no discernible change, whereas the cross section at RM 130 showed the <br />most significant change of any that we measured More than 30 m of the left bank was eroded at <br />RM 130, taking out the original left endpoint of the section (the right endpoint was located and the <br />section line re-established on the basis of ground photographs). The changes at RM 130 appear to <br />be the direct result of channel instability in the area a few hundred meters upstream. This area is <br />characterized by a number of channels and bars that continue shifting location. It also includes a <br />site where spawning activity has been suspected in the past (D. Osmundson, pers. comm.), and <br />thus it may be important to continue monitoring channel change in this area. <br />13
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.