Laserfiche WebLink
Figure 21. Downstream trends in bankfull shear stress and bankfull dimensionless <br />shear stress of the Colorado River ....................................................................................32 <br />Figure 22. Bed and water surface elevations through a reach near RKM 345 ....................... 33 <br />Figure 23. Relation between discharge and dimensionless shear stress, RKM 345 ..............34 <br />Figure 24. Bed and water surface elevations in reaches near RKM 150 and RKM 106........35 <br />Figure 25. Relations between discharge and dimensionless shear stress, RKM 150 <br />and RKM 106 .................................................................................................................. 36 <br />Figure 26. Box plots showing the range in discharges that produce initial motion in <br />specific subreaches of the Colorado River ........................................................................38 <br />Figure 27. Box plots showing the range in bankfull discharges in specific subreaches <br />of the Colorado River .......................................................................................................39 <br />ACKNOWLEDGMENTS <br />This study was funded by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Recovery Implementation Program <br />for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin. The Recovery Program is a joint <br />effort of the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), U. S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), <br />Western Area Power Administration (WAPA), States of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming, Upper <br />Basin water users, environmental organizations, and the Colorado River Energy Distributors <br />Association. We are especially grateful to Frank Pfiefer, Chuck McAda and Doug Osmundson of <br />the USFWS, and Tom Chart of the Utah Division of Wildlife for providing logistical support and <br />advice on various aspects of the project. Mark Van Steeter deserves special mention for initiating <br />field work in the Grand Junction area and for supplying data for the 15- and 18-mile reaches. We <br />greatly appreciate the enthusiasm and effort of all those who helped us in the field, including Cheri <br />Cornell, Margaret Franseen, Lex Ivey, David Lewis, Jennifer Nissenbaum, and Rebecca Thomas. <br />Finally, we thank Richard Marston, Jonathan Nelson, and Doug Osmundson for providing <br />comments on an earlier draft of the report. <br />rv