Laserfiche WebLink
E <br />E <br />0 <br />N <br />C <br />(7 <br />m <br />ea <br />CO) <br />V <br />m <br />m <br />400 <br />100 <br />10 <br />350 300 250 200 150 100 <br />Distance Upstream from Green River Confluence (km) <br />E <br />E <br />d <br />N <br />N <br />i <br />d <br />v <br />3 <br />a <br />N <br />100 <br />a <br />® ® ® ® ® ® •{{pp <br />® ® ®® ® ® ® ® i <br />® ®• •• ®e®0 0-®I -ER- - - - - JB - - - -• - - - D8 <br />• <br />00 <br />00 1, 03 G3 <br />0 <br />g- 00 D5 <br />b •O o' •0 0 0 b • 0 • 0N• 00[le <br />-? -.0_ - • - - - -E6 Cbo 0 0 • <br />°?0 --@---0-o------0 <br />0 0 0 0 • 0 "Cbo ? 0 0 0 D, <br />0 <br />b <br />1B M <br />?-_ffl-®--M---- <br />• <br />10 <br />1 <br />Cl <br />0 <br />0 0 0 <br />a__ _0_ o <br />o - -- - -- 0 <br />0 o --------°U -o--- o_ <br />? goo <br />350 300 250 200 150 100 <br />Distance Upstream from Green River Confluence (km) <br />Figure 18. Downstream trends in grain size of the Colorado River; (a) percentiles of the surface <br />sediment size distribution; (b) percentiles of the subsurface sediment size distribution. <br />Our cross section measurements indicate that the bankfull width and depth of the Colorado River <br />increase systematically downstream, although not in proportion to each other. The general trends in <br />cross section morphology (or hydraulic geometry) are illustrated in Figure 19, which shows a series <br />of main-channel cross sections arrayed from upstream to downstream. These sections are all <br />located in runs, thus they can be considered representative of individual reaches. Note the average <br />bankfull depth increases from about 2.5 in at RKM 345 (stratum 11) to about 5 in at RKM 106 <br />(stratum 2), whereas over the same distance, the average bankfull width increases from 114 m to <br />151 in (see Table 1). <br />29