My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8274
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8274
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:25:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8274
Author
Pitlick, J. and R. Cress.
Title
Longitudinal Trends in Channel Characteristics of the Colorado River and Implications for Food-Web Dynamics.
USFW Year
2000.
USFW - Doc Type
Recovery Implementation Program Project 48-C,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Trends in Suspended Sediment Loads <br />The suspended sediment load of the Colorado River increases systematically downstream as <br />sediment from erosive areas in western Colorado and eastern Utah enters the main stem. At <br />Glenwood Springs, near the eastern edge of the Colorado Plateau, the annual suspended sediment <br />load averages about 0.4 x 106 tons/yr (Table 5). Between there and the Cameo gauge, the annual <br />load increases by a factor of four to about 1.5 x 106 tons/yr. The annual load at the State Line <br />gauge is about 3.4 x 106 tons/yr, with most of this increase being due to the Gunnison River. At the <br />Cisco gauge the load is about 5.4 x 106 tons/yr (Table 5). This increase is relatively large <br />considering the Cisco and State Line gauges are only 55 km apart. However, the difference is not <br />unreasonable given the characteristics of the Dolores River basin (sparse vegetation, widespread <br />exposures of shale bedrock) and the influence of the late season storms. The annual suspended <br />sediment load at Cisco, while high (--87 t/km2/yr), is typical of large rivers in semi-arid regions. <br />Table 5. Summary statistics of average annual discharge and annual sediment load for 4 gauging <br />stations on the main stem of the Colorado River. <br />------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />USGS Drainage Period of Annual Discharge' Annual Sediment Load2 <br />Station No. Area (km2) Record' Q SD C, QS SD C, <br />9072500 11,800 1934-1997 64 19 0.29 0.37 0.30 0.82 <br />9095500 20,800 1934-1997 111 33 0.30 1.53 1.02 0.66 <br />9163500 46,200 1952-1997 180 72 0.40 3.43 2.67 0.78 <br />9180500 <br />--------------- 62,400 <br />--------------- 1934-1997 <br />-------------------- 200 <br />----------- 76 <br />------- 0.38 <br />------------- 5.43 <br />------------- 3.67 <br />---------- 0.68 <br />--------- <br />1. Periods of record for the Glenwood Springs gauge (9072500) and the Cisco gauge (9180500) were arbitrarily <br />truncated at 1934 to coincide with the period of record for the Cameo gauge (9095500); the record for the State <br />Line gauge (9163500) begins in 1952, thus no adjustment was made. <br />2. The mean (Q) and standard deviation (SD) are expressed in the same units as the data themselves, e.g., in m3/s <br />or millions of tons/yr; the coefficient of variation (C, = SD/Q )is dimensionless. <br />The large increase in sediment load between the Cameo and Cisco gauges reflects both an increase <br />in average sediment concentration and an increase in discharge. Referring back to eqn. 1, note that <br />Q, is a function of both CS and Q. The difference in Q between the Cameo and Cisco gauges is not <br />large enough by itself to account for the difference in QS, thus the downstream increase in sediment <br />load must be due to differences in suspended sediment concentration. To evaluate the importance <br />of this difference, we analyzed suspended sediment data from the Cameo and Cisco gauges further <br />by counting the number of observations in which suspended sediment concentrations fell within <br />specified ranges (excluding late-season events which produce concentrations >10,000 mg/1). The <br />results of this analysis (Fig. 13) show that, first, the frequency distributions of pre- and post-peak <br />suspended sediment concentrations are roughly log-normal at both gauges. Second, it is apparent <br />in comparing the data that sediment concentrations are generally higher at the Cisco gauge than they <br />are at the Cameo gauge. This is particularly true of the post-peak samples, in which concentrations <br />commonly exceed 500 mg/l at Cisco, but rarely reach these values at Cameo. In practical terms, <br />these results indicate that summer-time sediment concentrations and turbidity are typically higher in <br />downstream reaches than in upstream reaches. These differences are likely to have some effect on <br />ecological processes because, in general, primary productivity decreases as turbidity increases. <br />22
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.