Laserfiche WebLink
RESULTS <br />The results of our analyses are split into four sections. The first two sections focus on historical <br />changes in channel morphology in the uppermost study reach (Rifle-DeBeque), and long-term <br />trends in suspended sediment loads at the four mainstem gauging stations. The last two sections <br />focus on existing channel characteristics and bed load sediment transport relations. All of these <br />results have implications for habitats used by native fishes and other organisms, but the last two sets <br />of results are perhaps most important for providing information and data on contemporary <br />processes of habitat formation and maintenance. <br />Historical Changes in the Geomorphology of the Rifle-DeBeque Reach <br />Comparison of aerial photographs of the alluvial reach between Rifle and DeBeque indicates that <br />many portions of this reach have undergone significant geomorphic change since 1937. Figure 12 <br />shows relative differences in main channel area, island area and side channel-backwater area for <br />individual 1.6-km segments of the river. Figure 12a shows that he main channel has experienced <br />relatively small changes in planform area overall, with individual segments of the river equally <br />divided between those where channel area increased and those where channel area decreased. In <br />contrast, Figures 12b and 12c show that there have been significant changes in the area of islands <br />and side channels/backwaters. The change in island area is due mostly to the loss of several large <br />islands between RKM 352 and RKM 376 which appear to have been used as gravel pits during the <br />construction of the interstate highway. The change in side-channel/backwater area (Fig. 12c) is <br />very systematic, with 25 out of 39 subreaches showing a decrease in area. <br />Table 3 provides a summary of these data. When the difference in area is proportioned over the <br />total reach length of 58 km, the decrease in main channel area of -14 ha amounts to a reduction in <br />average channel width of about 3 m; such a change (-3%) is probably too small to be considered <br />significant. The changes in island area (-75 ha) and side channel area (-33 ha), on the other hand, <br />are clearly significant, and would probably be greater if we could remove the bias introduced by the <br />difference in flow levels in 1937 and 1995. Overall, the total area of islands in the study reach has <br />decreased by 20%, while the total area of side channels and backwaters has decreased by 31% <br />(Table 3). When the difference in area is proportioned over the total reach length, the total change <br />amounts to a 6 m decrease in the average width of side channels. Given that these features are <br />typically 10 to 20 m wide, a decrease in average width of 6 m represents a significant loss in <br />potential fish habitat. <br />Table 3. Summary of channel changes within the Rifle-DeBeque reach of the Colorado River. <br />-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />1937 1995 <br />Total Area Total Area <br />(ha) (ha) <br />-------------------------------------- <br />Main Channel 469 ---------------- <br />455 <br />Islands 386 311 <br />Side Channels 105 72 <br />Change in Change per Change <br />Total Area Unit Lengths in Area <br />(ha) (m) <br />------------------- <br />- (%) <br />------------ <br />---------------- <br />-14 - <br />-- <br />-3 -3 <br />-75 -13 -20 <br />-33 -6 -31 <br />1. The change in area per unit length is computed on the basis of a total reach length of 58 km. Islands and side <br />channels are not continuous over this length. <br />19