Laserfiche WebLink
Average annual hydrographs of the Colorado River constructed for separate periods before and <br />after 1950 illustrate the changes in streamflow patterns caused by reservoir operations and flow <br />diversions (Fig. 3). Compared to the period prior to 1950, peak discharges in spring and early <br />summer are now much lower than they were before, and base flows in fall and winter are higher. <br />Our analysis of streamflow records from the Cameo and Cisco gauging stations indicates that, since <br />1950, instantaneous peak discharges of the Colorado River have decreased by 29 and 33%, <br />respectively, at these two sites (Cress, 1997). <br />a) <br />500 <br />N <br />E 400 <br />W <br />rn <br />W <br />v 300 <br />N <br />a <br />a <br />200 <br />0 <br />W <br />100 <br />W <br />Q <br />0 <br />b) <br />800 <br />E <br />W <br />600 <br />r <br />v <br />N <br />a <br />>, 400 <br />W <br />W <br />W 200 <br />W <br />a <br />0 <br />9 <br />3 <br />Figure 3. Average annual hydrographs of the Colorado River for separate periods; (a) Colorado <br />River near Cameo, CO and (b) Colorado River near Cisco, UT. Note the September and October <br />spikes in flow in the pre-1950 Cisco hydrograph; these correspond to individual monsoon storms. <br />The same spikes do not appear in the Cameo record because this gauge is located near the northern <br />edge of the monsoon's influence (Fleener, 1997), and they are not as evident in the recent portion <br />of the Cisco record because of the influence of McPhee Reservoir on the Dolores River. <br />Colorado River near Cameo, CO <br />Colorado River near Cisco, UT <br />5 <br />JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV <br />JAN MAR MAY JUL SEP NOV