My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9670
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9670
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:24:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9670
Author
Pitlick, J.
Title
Channel Monitoring To Evaluate Geomorphic Changes On The Main Stem Of The Colorado River.
USFW Year
n.d.
USFW - Doc Type
Boulder, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Sediment Trap Data: Streambed sediment traps were installed in riffle and run habitats to <br />monitor the movement of fine sediment (broadly defined) on the receding limb of the hydrograph <br />when Colorado Pikeminnow normally spawn. The primary objectives of the trap measurements <br />were to determine the sizes of sediment in transport at that time, and to a lesser extent, to provide <br />qualitative information on transport rates. If one of the goals of coordinated reservoir releases is <br />to flush fine sediment from the bed to improve micro-habitats , then it is reasonable to consider <br />how long the benefits of a flushing flow may last. <br />The figures on the following page summarize the results from the trap measurements. <br />Hydrographs for the period of snowmelt runoff are shown for each of the four years in which the <br />traps were used, 1998-2001. The vertical lines on the hydrographs indicate specific dates that <br />the trap samples were taken. The figures to the right of the hydrographs show the grain size <br />distribution of the sediment taken from the traps; these do not include the first sample of the <br />year, which would include sediment collected any time during the previous 9-10 months. For <br />comparison, these figures also show the grain size distribution of the bed material (red lines), as <br />determined from three bulk samples of the subsurface sediment in the 15 mile reach. <br />The first point to note in these figures is that the grain size of the sediment caught in the <br />traps is much finer than the sediment sampled from the bed. The median grain size of the <br />subsurface sediment, Dsos, is about 30 mm (medium gravel), whereas the median grain size of <br />the trapped sediment is typically between 0.1 and 0.5 mm (fine-medium sand). About 10% of <br />the subsurface sediment falls in that size range. The sediment caught in the traps is found in <br />appreciable quantities in the bed, therefore, it represents a component of what Einstein [19501 <br />termed the bed material load (the other component- termed wash load- is sediment that is not <br />found in appreciable quantities in the bed; silt and clay fall into that category in this case). <br />42
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.