Laserfiche WebLink
after the peak in the hydrograph than it did before the peak, or (ii) the grain size of the sand <br />supply is becoming coarser with time, thus not as much sand is being carried in suspension, nor <br />is it being carried as high in the flow; some of the coarser sand could instead be moving as bed <br />load. It is not possible to distinguish between these effects without specific data characterizing <br />the evolution.of the grain size distribution of the suspended load over time. Whatever the case, <br />is not uncommon for the size distribution of the suspended load to change over time as finer or <br />coarser sediment becomes available. For example, suspended sediment measurements taken on <br />the Colorado River in Grand Canyon, before the construction of Glen Canyon dam, show that the <br />median grain size of the suspended load generally increased on the receding limb of the annual <br />hydrograph [Topping et al., 2000]. Similarly, measurements of the bed material and suspended <br />bed-material load taken in sand-bed reaches of the Rio Grande in the late 1950s likewise showed <br />that the bed material became coarser over the period of the hydrograph [Nordin and Beverage, <br />1965]. These observations are relevant to the present study because, if there is a natural <br />tendency for the grain size distribution of the suspended sediment load in the Colorado River to <br />coarsen with time, then any further reduction in peak flows could lead to a significant reduction <br />in the total mass of sand carried. It is important to maintain the mass balance of all sediment <br />sizes in order to maintain the existing channel capacity, as well as the existing suite of in-channel <br />habitats. The USGS data indicate that about 20% of the suspended load is sand-sized sediment, <br />which is approximately equal to the proportion of sand found in the substrate (bulk bed material). <br />The similarity in percentages suggests that the sand in transport in the Colorado River exchanges <br />in equal proportions with the sand stored in the bed, consistent with contemporary theories for <br />equilibrium transport in gravel-bed channels [Parker et al., 1982; Parker and Toro-Escobar, <br />2002]. <br />37