Laserfiche WebLink
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br />The 15-mile and 18-mile reaches of the Colorado River in western Colorado provide <br />important habitat for three endangered fishes: the Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus-lucius), <br />the razorback sucker (Xyrauchen-texanus), and the humpback chub (Gila Cypha). Success in <br />recovering these fishes will depend in large part on the maintenance and improvement of existing <br />habitats which have been lost or altered as a result of water management activities in the upper <br />Colorado River basin. Under certain conditions reservoir operations can be adjusted to allow a <br />portion of the runoff to bypass reservoirs, boosting peak spring flows in the 15- and 18-mile <br />reaches. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to assess the effects of coordinated reservoir <br />releases and normal snowmelt flows on geomorphic processes in the 15- and 18-mile reaches. <br />Conditions in specific reaches were monitored from 1998-2004 to verify thresholds for sediment <br />transport and to provide additional information on discharges that perform important geomorphic <br />functions. Field measurements focused on geomorphic effects of late spring-early summer flows <br />and seasonal variations in the movement of fine sediment. <br />The study period included several years of intense drought with very low runoff produced <br />throughout the upper Colorado River basin. U.S. Geological Survey records of streamflow <br />suggest that water years 2002-2004 were perhaps the lowest in the upper Colorado River basin in <br />the last 100 years. Nonetheless, coordinated reservoir operations were implemented for 7 days in <br />1998 and 10 days in 1999, resulting in increases in discharge of 40-56 m3/s (1500-2000 ft3/s), in <br />the 15-mile reach. The bypass flows were successful in boosting background flow levels by 10- <br />15%, which was sufficient to mobilize the bed material in a number of places in the 15- and 18- <br />mile reaches. The limited availability of water in subsequent years prevented further tests of the <br />geomorphic effects of bypass flows. The flows that did occur were well below average, thus the