My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7617
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7617
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:24:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7617
Author
Platania, S. P. and K. R. Bestgen.
Title
Survey of the Fishes of the Lower San Juan River, New Mexico.
USFW Year
1987.
USFW - Doc Type
Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Of the 14 forms collected, eight were represented by six or <br />fewer specimens. Included in these eight were two of the target <br />species (roundtail chub and Colorado squawfish), plus <br />flannelmouth x bluehead sucker hybrids. Of the remaining five <br />species, the red shiner and fathead minnow were most common in <br />backwaters while black bullhead, bluegill, and mottled sculpin <br />were uncommon throughout the study area. With the exception of <br />brown trout, the rest of the species (six) were represented by at <br />least 100 specimens, and they accounted for almost 99% of the <br />total number of fish caught by electrofishing. <br />The native flannelmouth and bluehead suckers were the most <br />frequently taken species (47% and 26%, respectively), comprising <br />73% of the total catch. Flannelmouth sucker occurred in all 98 _ <br />collections and bluehead sucker were collected at all but four of <br />the stations. The third and fourth most abundant species were <br />non-native common carp and channel catfish. While common carp <br />were collected at 83 localities and channel catfish at 59, both <br />species were actually more abundant than the data indicate (12% <br />and 11%, respectively). During electrofishing runs when we <br />encountered a reach which appeared to be particularly good <br />habitat for target species, we would concentrate our netting <br />effort on the native species. Common carp and catfish were <br />frequently avoided because their spines almost always became <br />tangled in the net, and we did not want to jeopardize our chances <br />of netting a Gila sp. or Colorado squawfish. <br />The native speckled dace, the fifth most abundant species, <br />was also much more common than the electrofishing data indicate. <br />25
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.