My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7277
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7277
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:23:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7277
Author
Papoulias, D.
Title
Survival and Growth of Larval Razorback Sucker,
USFW Year
1988.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
66 <br />original habitat in backwaters and channels of turbid, unpredictable, <br />desert rivers and the time of year when their eggs hatch. Larvae <br />appear mostly in February and March in Lake Mohave. under natural <br />conditions in the pristine Colorado River system, this timing would <br />have corresponded to later parts of a long period of low flow in <br />summer, autumn, and winter (Turner and Rarpiscak 1980), and may have <br />been a time of relatively high potential food supply in sandy- <br />bott?d, plankton poor habitats. Snowmelt typically resulted in <br />maximum yearly discharge in the Colorado mainstream during May and <br />June, during which time backwaters and channels would be flooded and <br />reshaped. The juvenile razorbacks, at this time 40 mm TL, or larger, <br />may have used backwater habitats or moved into smaller rivers and <br />creeks, or downstream to wider, slower-flowing areas. <br />Unlike survival, rates of growth of razorback sucker larvae in <br />high- and medium-treatment ponds were significantly greater than in <br />unfertilized ponds (Fig. 6). Nonetheless, larvae larger than 12.0 mm <br />TL from all ponds consistently had about 100 organisms in their <br />digestive tracts, apparently maintaltli.Tlg a near maximum fullness with <br />no significant increase in numbers of items eaten by shifting to <br />larger foods with growth (Fig. 8). Assuming 100% success, an <br />individual larva would have been required to search only 4.2 or 2.3 <br />_ i <br />41100 organisms in medium- and high-treatment ponds, respectively. <br />Two or three times that water volume, 8.0 1+1100 food items, and thus <br />more effort, would have been required in an unfertilized pond, so the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.