My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7277
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7277
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:23:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7277
Author
Papoulias, D.
Title
Survival and Growth of Larval Razorback Sucker,
USFW Year
1988.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
63 <br />Discussion and conclusions <br />Addition of nutrients to an aquatic system tends to effect <br />increases in densities of invertebrates (Geiger 1983; Geiger et al. <br />1985; Pace 1986), which could, in turn, enhance food-related survival <br />and growth of fishes. Based on chlorophyll a and zooplankton samples, <br />these projected results were evident in my experimental ponds. <br />Populations of primary producers and invertebrate consumers increased <br />rapidly after filling of both unfertilized and fertilized ponds at <br />Dexter NFH (Figs. 1-2). Patterns of biological development were <br />similar in all ponds, although variability was high. Fertilized ponds <br />developed greater numbers and bimiass of invertebrates than did <br />untreated ponds. Numbers were positively correlated with. <br />fertilization rates, but biomass in untreated ponds and those <br />fertilized at an intermediate level were similar and far lower than in <br />high-fertilization treatments (Fig. 2). Invertebrates were dominated <br />by small-sized taxa, especially early in the experiment. There was <br />greater size diversity of invertebrates when ponds were fertilized <br />than when they were not (Fig. 4). <br />There were, however, no significant differences in survival of <br />larval razorback suckers in the various treatments (Fig. 5). <br />Presence or absence of tiger salamander larvae, which are both <br />potential competitors and demonstrated predators on razorback sucker <br />larvae (Collins and Holamizki 1984; Papoulias unpubl. data), had no <br />discernible effect on sucker survival or growth.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.