My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7277
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7277
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:23:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7277
Author
Papoulias, D.
Title
Survival and Growth of Larval Razorback Sucker,
USFW Year
1988.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Consistent failure of razorback sucker year classes in Lake <br />Mohave, Arizona-Nevada, is not entirely understood. Th date, egg and <br />larval predation by non-native fishes has been considered the most <br />likely explanation. Alternatively, in marine systems, insufficient <br />amounts or qualities of foods, especially during the transition from <br />Yolk to exogenous feeding, is often identified as a major cause of <br />mortality of larval fishes. Rearing of razorback sucker larvae in <br />ponds fertilized at three levels, "high", Ismedium", and "low", with <br />mean invertebrate densities of 43.3, 23.7 and 12.5 o ;anisms/L <br />respectively, did not result in significant differences in survival of <br />razorback sucker (77.0, 89.8, and 67.4-1, respectively). However, <br />total larval biomass and growth were greater at the two higher <br />invertebrate densities. Razorback sucker larvae may successfully <br />survive a reduced food source through increased search effort at the <br />cost of growing more slowly. Volume of food in guts, but not mmibers <br />of food organisms, increased linearly with growth of larvae. Numbers <br />and volumes of food items did not differ relative to fertilization <br />treatment. First foods of larval razorbacks were diatoms, detritus <br />and algae. Soon, small rotifers and chircn raids were taken. As <br />larvae grew, larger organic, primarily cladocexans, were selected. <br />Based on larval survival relative to zocplankton standing crops <br />in Ponds, year-class failure of Lake Mohave razorback sucker may well <br />be attributable to nutritional deficiency at the lowest recorded <br />densities of reservoir zocplanktcn. However, starvation or food- <br />related problems do not seem likely explanations at the higher <br />zooplankton densities in Lake Mohave.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.