7776

• UCREFRP Catalog Number: 7776
• Author: Paddock, W. A. and W. C. Weiss.
• Title: A Primer on Colorado Water Law.
• USFW Year: 1986.
• USFW - Doc Type: \
• Copyright Material: NO

s
64/ Commonwealth Irr. Co. v. Rio Grande Canal, 96 Colo. 478, 45
P.2d 622 (1935).
65/ Masters Investment Co. v. Irrigationists Assoc., supra, n.
61.
66/ Farmers Res. & Irr. Co. v. Fulton, 108 Colo. 482, 120 P.2d
196 (1942); Parson v. Fort Morgan Res. & Irr. Co., 56 Colo. 146,
136 P. 1024 (1913).
67/ Grandb Ditch & Res. Co. v. Hallenbeck, 127 Colo. 236, 255
P.2d 636 (1953).
68/ Bagwell v. V-Heart Ranch, Inc., 690 P.2d 1271 (Colo. 1984).
69/ Bowers v. McFadzean, 82 Colo. 138, 257 P. 361 (1927).
70/ Ashley v. Clark, 34 Colo. 285, 82 P. 588 (1905).
71/ Surface Creek Ditch & Res. Co. v. Grand Mesa Resort Co.,
114 Colo. 543, 168 P.2d 906 (1946); Church v. Stilwell, 12 Colo.
App. 43, 54 P. 395 (1898).
72/ Lomas v. Webster, 109 Colo. 107, 122 P.2d 248 (1942);
Dzuris v. Kucharik, 164 Colo. 278, 434 P.2d 414 (1967); but see
Bagwell v. V-Heart Ranch, Inc., supra, n. 68 (a continuous and
exclusive scheduled use by a claimant may satisfy the burden of
proof even if the disputed water is at times used by others).
73/ Bagwell v. V-Heart Ranch, Inc., supra, n. 68.
74/ Grandby Ditch and Res. Co., supra, n. 68.
75/ Brighton Ditch Co. v. Englewood, supra, n. 53.
76/ Id.
77/ See, e.g., wheeler v. Northern Colo. Irr. Co., 10 Colo.
582, 17 P. 487 (1-88-7-F.-
78/ Id.
79/ Id.
80/ Id.
81/ See, e.g., City and County of Denver v. Brown, 56 Colo.
216, 138 P. 44 (1914).
-34-