My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7776
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7776
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:22:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7776
Author
Paddock, W. A. and W. C. Weiss.
Title
A Primer on Colorado Water Law.
USFW Year
1986.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3. Elements of an appropriation <br />Historically, with little exception it has been the rule that <br />there are two basic elements to an appropriation. The first is <br />that the water must be diverted from its source.. The second is <br />that the water diverted must be applied to some beneficial use. <br />a. Diversion requirement <br />The diversion requirement is generally held to mean the actual <br />physical taking of water from a stream and transporting it to an- <br />other location for use. The requirement of a diversion prevented <br />the appropriation of water for instream uses, such as the propa- <br />gation of fish and maintenance of the natural environment.21/ In <br />1973, the Colorado legislature revised sections 37-92-102 and <br />103, C.R.S. (1973), to authorize the Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board 22/ to acquire instream water rights and minimum lake lev- <br />els to preserve the natural environment to a reasonable degree. <br />The Colorado Supreme Court stated that a diversion is not consti- <br />tutionally required and upheld the constitutionality of this <br />statute.23/ The Water Conservation Board is now in the process <br />of adjudicating minimum stream flow and minimum lake level water <br />rights. ' <br />In addition, the means of diversion must be a reasonably effi- <br />cient one. At his own point of diversion on a water course, each <br />diverter must establish some reasonable means of effectuating his <br />diversion. He is not entitled to command the whole or a substan- <br />tial flow of the stream merely to facilitate his taking the frac- <br />tion of the whole to which he is entitled.24/ This principal ap- <br />plies equally to those who take their water from surface and un- <br />derground sources. Thus, well owners have been held not to be <br />entitled to the maintenance of a certain ground water level.25/ <br />b. Beneficial use <br />The constitution and applicable statutes all require that water <br />be placed to a beneficial use. The term beneficial use remained <br />undefined until the passage of the 1969 Act. Prior to that time, <br />the courts treated beneficial use as a question of fact which de- <br />pended upon the circumstances of each case.26/ The statutory <br />definition 27/ does little to clarify the meaning of the term ex- <br />cept to make clear that the impoundment of water for recreational <br />purposes, including fishery and wildlife propagation, is a bene- <br />ficial use. It also makes clear that minimum stream flows and <br />lake levels obtained by the Colorado Water Conservation Board are <br />beneficial uses of water. Other categories of beneficial use of <br />water which have been approved by the courts include domestic <br />-8-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.