Laserfiche WebLink
(Osmundson 1999a). <br />Clean cobble and gravel substrates of <br />upper reaches also provide suitable spawn- <br />ing sites for Colorado pikeminnow. As <br />eggs deposited in these areas hatch, emerg- <br />ing larvae drift downstream with the cur- <br />rent. In the Colorado River, most pikemin- <br />now larvae end up downstream of Moab, <br />Utah where the gradient flattens and the <br />river slows (Trammell and Chart 1999). <br />There, silt and sand is deposited creating <br />bars and associated backwaters. Backwat- <br />ers are warm, productive, still-water habi- <br />tats well suited for rearing of young Colo- <br />rado pikeminnow. During their first year of <br />life, Colorado pikeminnow concentrate in <br />backwaters and feed on zooplankton and <br />chironomid larvae (Muth and Snyder <br />1995). Later, as Colorado pikeminnow <br />become piscivorous, an abundance of small <br />prey fish continues to provide ample forage <br />(Osmundson et al. 1998). <br />As Colorado pikeminnow reach adult- <br />hood, larger forage fish are presumably <br />required to maintain body condition and <br />growth rates. However, such forage fish <br />are scarce in downstream reaches. As <br />young adults, Colorado pikeminnow begin <br />to disperse up and down the river (Fig. 3), <br />either in search of spawning areas or better <br />feeding grounds. Eventually, the more <br />abundant supplies of native fish in the <br />upper river are discovered and adult <br />pikeminnow remain there and establish <br />home ranges (Osmundson et al. 1998). <br />This dispersal pattern results in somewhat <br />segregated life stages with adult densities <br />clumped near the upstream margins of their <br />range. Currently, the Grand Valley con- <br />tains the greatest densities of adult Colo- <br />rado pikeminnow in the Colorado River <br />(Fig. 4). Also, this distribution pattern results <br />in the average size of Colorado pikeminnow <br />to progressively increase in an upstream <br />direction, with the greatest average size <br />occurring in the 15-mile reach (Fig. 5). Thus, <br />the importance of this reach is in providing <br />habitat for adults. <br />Compared to Colorado pikeminnow, <br />specific attributes of the life cycle of the <br />razorback sucker, in terms of its use of the <br />entire river, is largely unknown. However, <br />there are some similarities between the two <br />species: like Colorado pikeminnow, razor- <br />back adults are generally concentrated in <br />upstream regions of the Green and Colorado <br />rivers, they exhibit long-range spawning <br />migrations (Modde and Irving 1998), and <br />larvae drift downstream from spawning sites <br />in the middle and upper Green River (Chart <br />et al. 1999). Other evidence suggests that <br />flooded bottomlands along the Green and <br />Colorado rivers historically served as nursery <br />areas for larvae. Historically, bottomlands <br />were inundated more frequently and for a <br />greater duration each spring than occurs <br />under current river regulation practices <br />(Osmundson and Kaeding 1991; Modde <br />1996; Modde et al. 1996). <br />The 15-mile Reach in Perspective <br />Contemporary river ecology emphasizes <br />the propensity for biodiversity and bio- <br />production to be largely controlled by habitat <br />maintenance processes such as cut and fill <br />alleviation mediated by river discharge. <br />Along a river's length, environmental hetero- <br />geneity maximizes in alluvial reaches, and <br />floodplains appear to function as centers of <br />biophysical organization (Stanford et al.. <br />1996). In addition, core populations (rela- <br />5