My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9406
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9406
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:22:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9406
Author
Osmundson, D. B.
Title
Importance of the '15-Mile Reach' to Colorado River Populations of Endangered Colorado Pikeminnow and Razorback Sucker.
USFW Year
2000.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
flooded off-channel habitats where they <br />concentrated during spring (Kidd 1977, <br />Valdez et al. 1982). As recently as the late <br />1980s, razorback sucker were still occa- <br />sionally captured in the 15-mile reach, <br />primarily during their spring spawning <br />season (Osmundson and Kaeding 1991). In <br />the 1990s, only four razorback sucker were <br />captured in the Colorado River and these <br />were found in the reach immediately down- <br />stream of the 15-mile reach. Adult Colo- <br />rado pikeminnow, though rare, are rou- <br />tinely captured in the 15-mile reach <br />throughout the year (Osmundson and <br />Kaeding 1989, Osmundson et al. 1998), and <br />spawning there has been verified by the <br />collection of larvae in 1982 and 1995 <br />(McAda and Kaeding 1991; Anderson <br />1999). <br />SYNTHESIS <br />Distribution of Endangered Fish in the <br />Upper Colorado River <br />Though more is known about the life <br />history of Colorado pikeminnow than of <br />razorback sucker, both species evidently <br />require large stretches of river to fulfill their <br />respective life history needs. As individuals <br />progress through various life stages, their <br />habitat requirements change. For instance, <br />young Colorado pikeminnow rear in reach- <br />es where nursery habitat is most suitable, <br />whereas larger and older individuals move <br />to more upstream habitats where food for <br />adults is more abundant (Osmundson et al. <br />1998). This distribution pattern appears to <br />be consistent in both Colorado and Green <br />river systems. Colorado pikeminnow are <br />the top predator in the riverine food chain. <br />They subsist almost exclusively on a diet of <br />fishes and prefer areas where prey fish are <br />abundant. In the Colorado River, the great- <br />est fish production and consequently the <br />greatest number of adult Colorado pikemin- <br />now occur upstream of Westwater Canyon. <br />During recent studies (Osmundson 1999a), <br />electrofishing catch rates of forage-size fish <br />(mostly native suckers) were 3-4 times <br />higher in reaches upstream of Westwater <br />Canyon than in reaches downstream (see <br />Fig. 2). In the Green River, the majority of <br />adult Colorado pikeminnow are also found <br />in upper reaches as well as in two major <br />tributaries, the Yampa and White rivers <br />(McAda et al. 1994). <br />Upstream reaches generally have great- <br />er numbers of forage fish because food for <br />these fishes (algae and aquatic insects) is <br />more abundant than in downstream reaches <br />(Lamarra 1999). Higher water clarity, and <br />therefore deeper light penetration, allow <br />greater production of phytoplankton (free- <br />floating algae) and periphyton (algae that <br />grows on rock surfaces). These algae are <br />food for various species of aquatic inverte- <br />brates. Also, upper river reaches generally <br />have steeper gradients than the more down- <br />stream reaches, causing water to flow more <br />swiftly over the substrate. This serves to <br />clean silt and sand from the upper layer of <br />gravel and cobble. Silt-free crevices around <br />rocks provide important attachment sites and <br />living spaces for aquatic invertebrates <br />(Osmundson and Scheer 1998). Algae and <br />aquatic invertebrates living in these clean <br />substrates are food for native fishes such as <br />bluehead sucker Catostomus discobolus, <br />flannelmouth sucker Catostomus latipinnis <br />and roundtail chub Gila robusta which are <br />potential prey for Colorado pikeminnow <br />3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.