Laserfiche WebLink
below the Grand Valley, particularly below <br />Westwater Canyon, food is the limiting <br />resource for adult Colorado pikeminnow, <br />whereas at some point upstream of the <br />Grand Valley, temperature becomes limiting. <br />The Grand Valley appears to represent the <br />best available balance between these two <br />constraining resources. Also, floodplain <br />habitats, believed critical in meeting the life <br />history needs of razorback sucker, are more <br />plentiful in the floodplain of the Grand Valley <br />than in more confined reaches downstream. <br />Based on this understanding of the life <br />history and ecological requirements of Colo- <br />rado pikeminnow and razorback sucker, it is <br />the position of the U. S. Fish and Wildlife <br />Service that the prime adult habitat found in <br />the Grand Valley, including the 15-mile <br />reach, must be preserved and enhanced. The <br />population of subadult and adult Colorado <br />pikeminnow in the Colorado River currently <br />consists of only about 600-800 individuals <br />(Osmundson and Burnham 1998, Osmund- <br />son 1999b). An increase in the frequency of <br />strong year classes is needed to boost the <br />size of this population. For the nearly extir- <br />pated razorback sucker, stocking will first be <br />required to establish an effective breeding <br />population; naturalized reproduction and <br />recruitment will then be necessary for the <br />population to become self-sustaining. How- <br />ever, in addition to recruitment limitations, <br />quality adult habitat for both species is cur- <br />rently in short supply. To address this <br />shortfall, not only will access to historically <br />occupied reaches need to be restored, but <br />management efforts must also focus on <br />preserving and enhancing conditions in the <br />Grand Valley (including the 15-mile reach), <br />where the best available habitat for adult <br />Colorado pikeminnow and razorback sucker <br />currently exists. <br />ACKNOWLEDGMENTS <br />This report was made possible by the collective <br />efforts of numerous researchers and field techni- <br />cians working on a variety of projects. Helpful <br />reviews of earlier versions of this report were <br />provided by Daniel Byers, John Hawkins, Henry <br />Maddux, Thomas Nesler, Frank Pfeifer, David <br />Propst and Rich Valdez. Former Recovery Program <br />Director John Hamill originally perceived the need <br />for a synthesis of information on the 15-mile reach. <br />LITERATURE CITED <br />Anderson, R M. 1997. An evaluation of fish <br />community structure and habitat potential for <br />Colorado squawfish and razorback sucker in <br />the unoccupied reach (Palisade to Rifle) of the <br />Colorado River, 1993-1995. Final Report. <br />Colorado Division of Wildlife, Fort Collins, <br />Colorado. <br />Anderson, R M. 1999. Aspinall Studies: annual <br />assessment of Colorado pikeminnow larval <br />production in the Gunnison and Colorado <br />rivers, Colorado 1992-1996. Final Report. <br />Colorado Division of Wildlife, Grand Junc- <br />tion. <br />Bestgen, K. R, R. T. Muth, and M. A. Trammel. <br />1998. Downstream transport of Colorado <br />squawfish larvae in the Green River drainage: <br />temporal and spatial variation in abundance <br />and relationships with juvenile recruitment. <br />Final Report. Colorado State University, Fort <br />Collins. <br />Black, T., and R. V. Bulkley. 1985a. Growth rate <br />of yearling Colorado squawfish at different <br />water temperatures. Southwestern Naturalist <br />30:253-257. <br />Black, T., and R V. Bulkley. 1985b. Preferred <br />temperature of yearling Colorado squawfish. <br />Southwestern Naturalist 30:95-100. <br />Brandt, S. B., and J. Kirsch. 1993. Spatially <br />explicit models of striped bass growth poten- <br />tial in Chesapeake Bay. Transactions of the <br />American Fisheries Society 122:845-869. <br />Burdick, B. D. 1992. A plan to evaluate stocking <br />to augment or restore razorback sucker in the <br />upper Colorado River. Final Report. U. S. <br />Fish and Wildlife Service, Grand Junction, <br />Colorado. <br />Chart, T. E., D. P. Svendson, and L. Lentsch. <br />1999. Investigation of potential razorback <br />sucker (brauchen texanus) and Colorado <br />pikeminnow (Ptychocheiluslucius) spawning <br />in the lower Green River, 1994 and 1995. <br />Final Report. Utah Division of Wildlife Re- <br />sources, Moab, Utah. <br />13