Laserfiche WebLink
tively large populations occupying quality <br />habitat) are believed critical for persistence <br />of metapopulations (Schoener 1991, Harri- <br />son 1991, 1994, Stanford et al. 1996). In <br />rivers, large alluvial reaches often support <br />core populations of fishes (Lichatowich and <br />Mobrand 1995). The current distribution of <br />Colorado pikeminnow and the historic <br />distribution of razorback sucker in the <br />upper Colorado River appears to fit this <br />model, with core populations centered in <br />the alluvial Grand Valley. <br />To understand the habitat needs of <br />Colorado pikeminnow and razorback suck- <br />er, an ecological perspective is required that <br />takes into account all phases of their life <br />cycles and recognizes that population dyna- <br />mics occur at a scale encompassing hun- <br />dreds of miles of river. Thus, the relative <br />importance of a particular area, such as the <br />15-mile reach, cannot be viewed in isola- <br />tion, but must be viewed in the context of <br />how it fits into the larger life history picture. <br />A river without good adult habitat cannot <br />support a viable population, just as a river <br />without good spawning or nursery habitat <br />cannot. The reach downstream of Moab, <br />Utah is critically important in a similar way, <br />because it contains the best nursery habitat <br />in the Colorado River. Failure to consider <br />these facts can lead to the false conclusion <br />that because the 15-mile reach constitutes <br />only 8% of the 185 occupied miles of the <br />Colorado River (above the Green River <br />confluence), it plays only a small role in <br />maintaining populations of Colorado pike- <br />minnow and razorback sucker. To the con- <br />trary, the data suggest that prime adult <br />habitat is restricted to the upper 60 miles of <br />this 185-mile-long Colorado River reach, <br />with the best habitat and greatest concentra- <br />tions of adults located in the 33-mile-long <br />Grand Valley. With this perspective, the <br />importance of the 15-mile reach becomes <br />apparent. <br />The Recovery Implementation Program <br />for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper <br />Colorado River Basin has plans to provide <br />fish passage at diversion structures up- <br />stream of the 15-mile reach to allow Colo- <br />rado pikeminnow and razorback sucker <br />access to upstream portions of their histori- <br />cal range. The 15-mile reach, and the short <br />3-mile reach just upstream, currently consti- <br />tute the upstream limit of the Colorado <br />pikeminnow's range in the mainstem Colo- <br />rado River. The Price-Stubb Dam has <br />blocked upstream movements offishes since <br />its construction in 1911. Razorback sucker <br />have been found upstream of these diver- <br />sions relatively recently; one was captured <br />in 1991 near Rifle, Colorado, some 55 miles <br />upstream of Palisade (Burdick 1992). <br />However, no similar upstream capture <br />records, either recent or historic, exist for <br />Colorado pikeminnow despite intensive <br />sampling from Price Stubb Dam to Rifle <br />during the past three decades (Kidd 1977, <br />1979; Valdez et al. 1982; Anderson 1997; <br />Osmundson 1999a). Numbers of pikemin- <br />now in this reach likely diminished over <br />time as a result of the long-term effects of <br />the diversion dams preventing return migra- <br />tion after larvae or adults moved down- <br />stream. Providing passage to this area <br />should prove beneficial to the Colorado <br />River population by increasing the amount <br />of adult habitat. Because adult habitat is in <br />short supply, the extent to which this up- <br />stream reach will provide suitable habitat <br />has a bearing on the relative importance of <br />the 15-mile reach. <br />8