Laserfiche WebLink
INTRODUCTION <br />Growth and survival rates are fundamental components of most demographic studies of long- <br />lived species and are essential to understanding population dynamics. Determination of <br />population status and trend and identification of factors limiting population increase are <br />requisite to formulating recovery goals and management strategies for endangered species. <br />Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus lucius), an endangered, long-lived, cyprinid endemic to <br />the Colorado River system, has been the focus of much life-history research in recent years. <br />Previous studies of age and growth of Colorado squawfish have relied on scale analysis, <br />whereby age is determined by counting numbers of scale annuli and growth is estimated as the <br />difference in calculated fish lengths predicted from relationships between length and radius of <br />scale annuli (e.g., Vanicek and Kramer 1969, Seethaler 1978, Musker 1981, and Hawkins <br />1992). Problems inherent in scale-based aging and growth estimation for long-lived species <br />prompted us to refine existing growth estimates of Colorado squawfish by utilizing newly <br />available, mark-recapture-based, growth data. Age estimates derived from the refined growth <br />estimates enabled us to also assess adult survival rates. <br />Techniques used in scale analyses are fairly standardized (e.g., Tesch 1968, Carlander 1969). <br />While results of such analyses have proven reliable for some species, for others they have been <br />largely unreliable (Beamish and McFarlane 1987). Scales were considered by Scoppetone <br />(1988) to be unreliable for accurately aging many western North American catostomids and <br />cyprinids because age was considerably underestimated in long-lived individuals. Although <br />validation of aging techniques using known-age fish is a critical component of studies <br />attempting to estimate age and growth from scales, such validation is often lacking in non- <br />game fish due to the scarcity of known-age individuals. Aging other bony structures (e.g., <br />vertebrae, otiliths, opercles, etc.) may corroborate results from scales but this constitutes only <br />a partial validation at best (Beamish and McFarlane 1983), and requires sacrifice of the <br />animal. <br />Problems specific to aging Colorado squawfish include the lack of annulus formation during <br />the first year, and the compression and loss of outer annuli by older fish (Hawkins 1992). <br />Lack of first-year annulus formation has been corrected by adding a year to the number of <br />annuli (Seethaler 1978, Hawkins 1992), but problems with distinguishing and counting outer <br />annuli can result in underestimation of ages and population age frequencies, resulting in many <br />fish assigned to the age where the method fails (Beamish and McFarlane 1983, Hawkins <br />1992). Hawkins (1992) suggested that differences in average annual growth increments for <br />Colorado squawfish > 500 mm TL, calculated from scales (30 mm/year) and those from <br />recaptures of tagged fish (10-15 mm/year), may be due to a negative effect from Carlin <br />dangler tags on tagged fish. Indeed, Floy tags, another type of external tag, reduce growth in <br />trout (Carlin and Brynildson 1972, Mourning et al. 1994), though not in largemouth bass <br />(Tranquilli and Childers 1982). <br />The recently developed, small and internally-implanted Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT) <br />tag enhances the ability to permanently mark individual fish and track growth through <br />successive years. Burdick and Hamman (1993) reported 98-100 % tag verification 20-24