Laserfiche WebLink
52 <br />formation of a small overflow pond of shallow water covering an <br />area about 350 square meters, and a mean depth of 30 cm. In <br />April 1977, 300 adult pupfish (in a 172 ?: 128 a), collected from <br />the Warm Spring refuge, were introduced into this habitat. Sixty- <br />three days later fry were observed in the overflow area on the <br />west side of the pond. Eighty-four days after introduction, young <br />pupfish were easily observed and trapped throughout the shallow <br />pond; however, they were never observed or trapped in the main <br />channel (-'depth 2.51. The adults which were introduced into <br />the main channel were rarely seen. The incipient population <br />appeared to have been readily reestablished. Therefore, the <br />remaining objectives of this study were pursued. <br />The estimation of <br />1977, June, 1978, and <br />and recapture method. <br />weighed to the nearest <br />nearest mm, caudal fin <br />population size n was made during September, <br />ieptember, 1978, using the Peterson mark <br />Pupfish were captured in minnow traps, <br />0.1 gram, standard length measured to the <br />clipped, and then released. <br />Population size was estimated at 2,000 fish in September, 1977, <br />9,000 fish in June, 1978, and ti 10,000 fish in September, 1978. It <br />appeared that the population had stabilized during the 1978 season. <br />This may be due to two reasons: the population stabilizing near <br />the carrying capacity of the pond or, emigration of young fish <br />downstream from the pond (and out of the sanctuary) may be <br />cropping the population below the carrying capacity. The second <br />thesis is supported from observations made in late June, 1978, <br />when I estimated a population size of 560 fish in an area 25 <br />meters downstream from the pond (below the downstream dam). <br />then explored the marshy areas and other ponds one mile downstream <br />from the sanctuary where I found pupfish (< 25 mm) young quite <br />common. The general distribution pattern is described as a <br />population of segregated age groups -- with larger fish (older) <br />dispersing just a short distance from the sanctuary and the <br />smaller fish (younger) dispersing further downstream. <br />The average size in September, 1977, of the first generation <br />was 28.3 mm, with a mean weight of 0.9 grams (n=389)• In <br />September, 1978, the average size of the total population was <br />30.4 mm, with a mean weight of 0.98 g (n=821). <br />In September, 1978, less than ten percent of the population <br />was made up of adult pupfish, which had a mean length of 42.9 mm <br />and a mean weight of 2.7 g. I classified these fish as Age <br />Group I, they are the surviving members from the 1977 first <br />generation. Age Group II was made up of 1978 young and had an <br />average length of 29.3 mm and a.;& weight of 0.84 g. <br />By calculation, I estimated the standing crop and production <br />at various time intervals. Biomass in April, 1977 (0.81 kg), <br />was due entirely to the introduced adults from Warm Spring