Laserfiche WebLink
3 <br />Recent declines in populations of shortnose suckers Chasmistes brevirostris and <br />Lost River suckers Deltistes luxatus, native to the Upper Klamath River system in <br />California and Oregon, resulted in their addition to the federal endangered species list in <br />1988 (Williams 1988). Their declines have been attributed to a wide array of factors, <br />including the presumed negative impacts of exotic species (USFWS 1992). <br />Hypothesized negative impacts of non-native fish on endangered suckers include (among <br />other things) predation, competition for food and space, and introduction of exotic <br />diseases or parasites, although no research has assessed these hypotheses. <br />The most recently established exotic fish in the Upper Klamath River system is the <br />fathead minnow Pimephales promelas, which probably became established in Upper <br />Klamath Lake between 1974 and 1979 (Andreasen 1975; Ziller 1991). Fathead minnows <br />rapidly increased in numbers in Upper Klamath Lake thereafter, they comprised 18 % of <br />the catch by number in a trap net in 1983 (Ziller 1991). In 1992, fathead minnows <br />numerically dominated fish caught in trap nets set in Upper Klamath and Agency Lakes <br />(directly connected to Upper Klamath Lake) by a wide margin (Logan and Markle 1993). <br />High densities of adult fathead minnows occupy the same shoreline nursery <br />habitats as larval suckers in Upper Klamath Lake (Buettner and Scoppettone 1990), <br />prompting concern about their potential predatory impacts. While food habits of fathead <br />minnows in Upper Klamath Lake are unknown, elsewhere their diets are reported to <br />include algae, aquatic insect larvae, zooplanltton, detritus, and mud (Carlander 1969; <br />Scott and Crossman 1973; Held and Peterka 1974). The only record I found of piscivory <br />was in Franzin and Harbicht (1992), who found walleye Stizostedion vitreum larvae in <br />stomachs of fathead minnows captured in trap nets. However, they were uncertain <br />whether the predation occurred befo captum r resulted ntrating redato s Jae+ ,, <br />and prey in the trap net. -CrVCny In a a ac?e.u? <br />miz pre,xperimental trial for this study iaAvW*h- five fathead minnows ate d- <br />A L-t . 44"4 ct <br />39 of 40 Lost River sucker larvae.shewed that fathead minnows were willing and able to <br />consume sucker larvae. <br />Th s demonstration of piscivory by fathead minnows coupled with their high <br />densities in nursery habitats of endangered suckers in Upper Klamath Lake prompted <br />study of the predatory interactions of fathead minnows with sucker larvae under <br />laboratory conditions. In this study I assessed predation rates of fathead minnows on <br />sucker larvae in tanks as influenced by water depth, the presence and absence of cover, <br />the presence of alternate prey, and fathead, minnow mouth size relative to body size of <br />sucker larvae.