My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9404
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9404
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:17:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9404
Author
Douglas, M. E. and P. C. Marsh.
Title
Ecology and Conservation Biology of Humpback Chub (Gila cypha) in the Little Colorado River.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
Tempe.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
heterogeneity effects; Otis et al., 1978:40--50). The model with <br />the second-highest criterion (i.e., the Null model; Mj is also <br />the simplest in that it presumes all members of the population <br />ar> sc:ally at risk of capture on every trapping occasion. <br />Is estimator (Mb) assumes capture probabilities vary with <br />t_-!-% a,. d with behavioral effects (such as trap-happiness, <br />try ?- - The last tw-) models (Jackknife estimator Mh, and <br />ha_ N:L,. ac:?ept that capture probabilities vary b':' individual <br />Movement by season within- and among reaches.---To determine <br />extent of movement by G. cypha within the LCR, capture and <br />subsequent recapture(s) for 1992 were compiled by reach and <br />season (Table 1--3). Because these data reflect numbers of <br />individuals tagged within each reach for a given season then <br />subsequently recaptured, percentages for each reach and season <br />total 100%. For G. cypha tagged at confluence during winter anc <br />subsequently recaptured, 49% (n = 47) were taken upstream in <br />Powell or Salt reaches during winter/spring. Similarly, of those <br />tagged at confluence during spring and subsequently recaptured, <br />51% (n = 96) were taken upstream during spring/summer. For Powell <br />reach, 18% (n = 7) of recaptures initially tagged there during <br />winter were taken in Salt reach during winter/spring, while 31% <br />(n = 59) of recaptures tagged there in spring were taken at Salt <br />during spring/summer. Overall, 21% of total movements in 1992 <br />(ascertained by mark/recapture) was upstream. <br />Elevated population estimates at confluence in <br />Jariary/February of 1992 (Fig. 1--3b), followed by upstream <br />movement, argue strongly for staging. Estimates at the confluence <br />peaked in early March, then gradually decreased through June. A <br />similar peak occurred within Powell Canyon reach in late March, <br />extended into April, then decreased into June. Population size <br />did not peak in Salt Canyon reach until April; estimates remained <br />elevated through June. The last six months of 1992 were similar <br />to that of 1991 (Fig. 1--3a, 1--3b), with estimated population <br />sizes dwindling through late summer. However, estimates rose <br />again in Autumn, 1991 but remained low during a similar period in <br />1992. <br />Evidence for downstream movement is less convincing (Table <br />1--3). Of G. cypha tagged in Powell reach during winter and <br />subsequently recaptured, 21% (n = 8) were taken at confluence in <br />the remainder of the year. Similarly, 16% (n = 30), and 15% (n = <br />15) of recaptures tagged at Powell in spring and summer, <br />respectively, were taken at confluence in the remainder of the <br />year. At Salt, 16% (n = 33) and 7% (n = 12) of recaptures tagged <br />in spring and summer, respectively, were taken in the two lower <br />reaches over the remaining seasons. Overall, 9% of recaptures in <br />1992 indicated downstream movement. <br />Table 1--3 primarily reflects population stasis by reach, <br />6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.