My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7994
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:15:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7994
Author
Duff, D. A., Tech. Ed.
Title
Conservation Assessment For Inland Cutthroat Trout, Distribution, Status and Habitat Management Implications.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Introduction <br /> <br />The information contained in this status review focuses upon 5 subspecies of North American <br />inland cutthroat trout, i.e. the Yellowstone cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki bouvie,,) and the <br />fine-spotted cutthroat trout, (0. c. subspp.), principle subspecies of cutthroat trout that historically <br />occupied the upper portion of the Snake River, within the Columbia River basin; the westslope <br />cutthroat (0. c. lewis/) which occupied the Northern Rockies in Montana, Idaho, and eastern <br />Oregon and Washington; the Bonneville cutthroat (0. c. utah), which occupied the Bonneville <br />Basin within the Great Basin; the Colorado River cutthroat (0. c. pleuriticus), of the upper Green <br />River and Colorado River basins in Utah, Colorado, and Wyoming; and the Rio Grande cutthroat <br />(0. c. virgina/is) of the upper Rio Grande River basin in New Mexico and Colorado. Figure 1 illustrates <br />the inland cutthroat trout subspecies historic distribution within their separate hydrologic sub-basins. <br /> <br />General concern for the well being of these native trout species has been elevated as a result of <br />recent assessments (Williams et aI. 1989 and Warren and Burr 1994). The assessments pointed <br />to a dramatic decline in the status of many freshwater fish species with as many as 364 freshwater <br />fish (about one-third of the American native freshwater fishes) identified as endangered, threatened <br />or of special concern (Williams et aI. 1989). The situation is particularly bleak within the western <br />states (Warren and Burr 1994) which have a proportionately higher percentage of imperiled native <br />species. Western trout (Behnke, 1976, 1992) and salmon (Nehlsen et aI. 1991) have suffered <br />catastrophic declines in abundance due to essentially similar factors (e.g. exotic species introduction, <br />habitat degradation, and overharvest). <br /> <br />Concern for the status of western cutthroat prompted the Forest Service to initiate Habitat <br />Conservation Assessments for many interior cutthroat trout subspecies. In 1992. the Chief asked <br />the Forest Service Regions to develop inter-regional habitat conservation assessments (HCA) <br />addressing species' habitat requirements throughout their inhabited range on National Forests <br />and Grasslands. The purposes of these HCA's are to update and synthesize existing management <br />and research information and to develop a common base of technical knowledge for decisionmakers. <br />To encourage shared ownership and to solicit technical assistance as well as an opportunity to <br />facilitate informed consensus with partners, ie. state, federal, interest groups, and public interests, <br />the HCA's were viewed as an interdisciplinary effort among resources. The HCA's provide baseline <br />data from which to make future resource decisions on National Forest System (NFS) lands. Rather <br />than decision documents, the HCA's are technical tools to be used by line officers and decisionmak- <br />ers to develop management strategies and to identify necessary changes in current management <br />direction or in project planning. <br /> <br />In 1994, the Chief further reiterated the need for HCA's to receive priority emphasis for species <br />protection and management. Many HCA efforts require inter-regional and multi-state coordination <br />on wide ranging species that cover more than one FS region. Examples include recent multi-agency <br />and inter-regional efforts on bull trout (Sa/velinus confluentus), and the Inland Native Fish Strategy. <br /> <br />The information contained in this HCA focuses on the five inland cutthroat trout. The goal associated <br />with this cutthroat trout HCA is to provide information linked to habitat conditions necessary to <br />ensure the long term survival of these subspecies within the interior western United States. In <br />addition, population status, distribution, and trend is addressed and related to habitat and species <br />management within the historic range of these cutthroat trout subspecies. This status assessment <br />is designed to complement and to be an extension of an earlier HCA document on the inland <br />cutthroat for these five subspecies which was prepared by Forest Service research fisheries <br /> <br />" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.