7994 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

potential. The watersheds should have established Riparian Habitat Conservation Ar- eas (RHCA's) with specific riparian management objectives (RMO's) designed to modi- fy, postpone, or cancel any .unacceptable risk. activities that may cause habitat to decline and populations to decrease such that the continued existence of the popula- tion within priority watersheds is at risk. For activities or groups of activities, which could include grazing, mining, timber harvest, roading, etc. which are considered to pose an unacceptable risk to the population, a preferred course of action should be identified and implemented, through NEPA and Forest Plan amendment, to ensure that they no longer pose unacceptable risk to subspecies restoration. In order for any naturalization of watersheds to occur, the cause must be treated, not just the symptom of the ecological disruption. Ecosystem assessments at the forest planning level should be completed at the watershed and sub-basin scales to enhance these management efforts. 3. State and federal agencies should cooperate, along with all their respective local publics and conservation group partners, in developing and implementing sub-species specific conservation strategies and agreements that provide for establishment of genetically pure BCT populations within sub-basins of their historic occurrence. Each sub-basin should be assigned a specific number of waters, viable population sizes, and habitat condition to assure adequate recovery within each major geographic area of occurrence, i.e. Western Bonneville population, Northern Bonneville, etc. 4. Restoration efforts should focus on multiple species management within aquatic eco- systems in sub-basins rather than single species management. Indigenous non-game fish, and other aquatic biota must be considered as they share the same stream systems. It should be a standard practice to also provide for these biota rather than placing them at risk, and pushing them towards federal listing status and possible extinction. 5. Metapopulation dynamics should be considered, where possible, to enhance protec- tion of phenotypic and genetic diversity of populations as well as enhancing long term population viability. Conventional land-use management has compromised the metap- opulation process and natural stream mosaic patterns and habitat conditions of historic BCT populations. The creation and maintenance of a more natural mosaic stream - habitat interchange within sub-basins should commence wherever possible. The natu- ralization of certain watersheds to resemble predisturbance conditions will increase populations chances for future survival. 6. States, through their management plans, should emphasize indigenous species resto- ration, both for scientific uses and recreational public purposes. The designation of both .conservation. and .management. populations within sub-basins would enhance scien- tific and biological integrity of BCT populations, while at same time allowing the public user to benefit from a unique resource specific to local cultural heritage. SUMMARY The recovery of the BCT within the Bonneville Basin must continue to focus on an integrated ecosystem approach within priority sub-basins and watersheds. State and federal agency coopera- tion and communication in aCT program emphasis must be stressed, as well as responsibility to and accountability for management activities and decision making. Accomplishment of this responsibility 56