Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Basin would account for less than 0.002% of total historic stream miles. Expansion of the existing <br />range of SB populations and discovery of additional populations has been accomplished through <br />cooperative interagency efforts by Dale Hepworth, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR). This <br />assessment indicates overall population status of 23 total SB populations to be .secure, stable. (SST) <br />due to transplants into the historic range (Table 2). <br /> <br />Five of the SB populations are remnant (2 on Fishlake NF; 3 on Dixie NF), and eighteen are <br />transplanted (7 on Fishlake NF; 11 on Dixie NF). Two transplanted populations in the Fishlake NF are <br />lake-reservoir populations (Manning Meadow Lake and Barney lake) totaling about 76 surface acres. <br />Existing habitat occupancy in four sub-basins, on two NF's (Fishlake & Dixie NF's) indicate 45% <br />occupancy in thirteen streams within the 47.1 total stream miles renovated. Expansion of SB popula- <br />tions in these waters will continue in these renovated habitats for the remaining 55% of available <br />habitat ensuring .stable, secure. (SST) population status, as well as increasing their use as .brood <br />stock. sources for future renovation-expansion activities (Dale Hepworth UDWR, personal communi- <br />cation, 1996). Hepworth estimates that 25 stream miles in the upper Virgin River sub-basin could have <br />been present historically when a natural geologic stream capture event possibly occurred. Currently, <br />these ten populations on the Dixie NF occupy 16.2 miles of habitat of a total 33 stream miles suitable <br />habitat available. This is 49% stream occupancy but these secure, stable populations that will expand <br />their range into the unoccupied, and available habitat. According to Hepworth, this population of SB <br />will only be used for transplants within the sub-basin of its occurrence. It would not be transplanted <br />into the Sevier River sub-basin, thereby protecting genetic diversity of BCT populations within major <br />sub-basins. <br /> <br />Genetic verification of the twenty-three SB populations indicate validation for meristics at 74%, <br />electrophoresis 78%, and in DNA 52% (Table 7). Population status of nine populations on the Fishlake <br />NF indicate 67% .secure, expanding. (SEX), and 33% .secure, stable. (SST) and 7% .at risk, declining. <br />(ARD). Threats from exotic fish presence is minimal, possibly less than 5% since stream rehabilitation <br />and barriers have eliminated past threats to populations from hybridization and competition- <br />displacement (Table 9). <br /> <br />Current habitat assessment for SB populations indicate 39% in excellent condition (64% Dixie NF), <br />31 % good condition (21 % Dixie NF; 67% Fishlake NF), 22% fair condition (33% Fishlake NF; 14% Dixie <br />NF), and 4% each In poor to extremely degraded condition (Dixie NF). Overall habitat trend Indicates <br />increasing habitat availability at 52% (57% Dixie NF; 44% Fishlake NF), stable habitat at 26% (21 % <br />Dixie NF; 33% Fishlake NF), and 22% is .unknown. trend (22% Dixie NF; 21 % Fishlake NF). Habitat <br />condition on lands adjacent to NF's were estimated to be extremely degraded (39% +) with greater <br />than 43% trending toward declining condition (Table 13). <br /> <br />Factors affecting habitat condition were sedimentation 26% (Dixie NF at 36%; Fishlake NF at 11 %), <br />and changes in channel morphology, dewatering and lack of woody debris 39% (Dixie NF at 36%; <br />Fishlake NF at 44%) (Table 15). Land use activities contributing to these factors and conditions were <br />grazing 17% (Dixie NF at 14%; Fishlake NF at 22%), logging 11% (Fish lake NF), and roading 14% <br />(Dixie NF). <br /> <br />MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS <br /> <br />The future survival of the BCT within the Bonneville Basin will depend on interagency and inter-state <br />coordination of all responsible state and federal agencies, interested groups, and the public. Each <br />of the four states (UT, NV, ID, WY) BCT species management plans and individual Forest Plans of <br />the nine National Forests must serve as the catalyst for implementing species recovery and habitat <br /> <br />52 <br />