My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7994
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:15:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7994
Author
Duff, D. A., Tech. Ed.
Title
Conservation Assessment For Inland Cutthroat Trout, Distribution, Status and Habitat Management Implications.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Chapter 3 <br /> <br />Bonneville Cutthroat Trout <br />Oncorhynchus clarki utah <br /> <br />Don Duff, Aquatic Ecologist <br />Forest Service/Trout Unlimited <br />USDA Forest Service <br />8236 Federal Building 125 South State Street <br />Salt Lake City, Utah 84138 <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />The Bonneville cutthroat trout (Bel) is the only trout native to the Great Basin within Utah. This <br />subspecies is endemic to the Bonneville Basin, the largest endorheic basin in the Great Basin of the <br />western North America, comprising about 132,650 km2.lake Bonneville once extended over 51,840 <br />km2, with a maximum depth of over 300m. About 30,000 years ago the Bear River lost its connection <br />with the Snake River through volcanic activity and changed its course into the Bonneville Basin. <br />Ancestral cutthroat trout could have been present before this divergence but would have been <br />exposed to Yellowstone cutthroat trout from the upper Snake River basin as the Bear River flowed <br />into the Bonneville Basin. Historically, subspecies are geographical races, isolated and differentiated <br />from all other subspecies of the species. Probably two separate ancestral invasions of the Bonneville <br />basin occurred. Both invasions would have probably come from similar ancestor Yellowstone cut- <br />throat trout of the Snake River and some mixing-blending should have occurred (Dr. Robert Behnke, <br />personal communication 1996). Behnke states that although the Bear River utah do share more <br />close-relatedness to the Yellowstone cutthroat, because they came into the basin later than the first <br />invasion, they share enough similarities to the other utah for all to be regarded as one subspecies. <br />This mixing and the apparent genetic differentiation is evident today between the Bonneville cutthroat <br />trout from the Bear River basin and those from the main Bonneville Basin (Behnke 1992, Hickman <br />1978, Shiozawa et al. 1993). <br /> <br />The subspecies was historically abundant throughout all suitable waters of the vast Bonneville basin <br />area encompassing portions of Utah, Nevada, Idaho, and Wyoming until about 8,000 years ago <br />during the final desiccation of ancient Pleistocene lake Bonneville (Broecker and Kaufman 1965, <br />Hunt 1953). At this time the cutthroat trout were forced into streams throughout the basin, forming <br />isolated, disjunct populations (Figure 1). For example, the Snake Valley strain of the Bonneville <br />cutthroat has been geographically isolated from the eastern Bonneville Basin for about 8,000 years. <br />However, reproductive isolation may have occurred long before that time as glacial lake Bonneville <br />was noted for many large lake level fluctuations during its history. Many populations throughout the <br />basin became isolated from one another since that time by this natural habitat fragmentation. The <br />lake's Snake Valley arm was rather ephemeral in geographical time, and only during the lakes <br />maximum elevation (ca. 18,000 BP) was it connected, and then isolated from the rest of the basin as <br />the lake level dropped (Behnke 1976). Zoogeographical evidence for fish distribution in the Great <br />Basin points to their occurrence habitats in which they have been able to reach through surface-water <br />migrations. Thus, their dispersal is very closely linked with climate and hydrogeographic history <br />(Hubbs and Miller 1948). <br /> <br />35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.