Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1. Maintenance and enhancement may require removal of hybridizing and competitive species <br />from within Yellowstone cutthroat trout watersheds or adjacent drainages. In situations where <br />Yellowstone cutthroat populations are likely to be negatively influenced by other fish species. <br />the States will need to take appropriate action to eliminate potential threats. <br /> <br />2. Some populations may require artificial supplementation to off-set negative influences <br />associated with limited exchange of genetic material or to provide critical mass necessary for <br />population increases. <br /> <br />3. A significant number of the sub-basins had habitats that were rated less than good. Habitat <br />restoration and enhancement actions that would lead to increasing habitat quality ratings <br />should be implemented, especially for habitats within the National Forests and other federal <br />lands. <br /> <br />4. It may also be beneficial to extend current distribution by introducing Yellowstone cutthroat <br />into waters which were not historically occupied but are within the historic range. Included <br />would be lakes and streams that were historically fish less but that currently support non-native <br />species. It may also be desirable to introduce Yellowstone cutthroat into environments that are <br />currently fishless pending a thorough analysis of each water proposed. <br /> <br />5. Maintenance of Yellowstone cutthroat trout populations existing outside of the historic range <br />may serve to enhance the conservation of this subspecies. If populations existing outside of <br />the historic range pose little threat to native flora and fauna. preservation of these populations <br />should be considered as a conservation measure. This would only apply to genetically pure <br />populations and protective and maintenance considerations would apply. <br /> <br />Restoration of Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout <br /> <br />The third focus (priority) of Yellowstone cutthroat conservation would be associated with Increasing <br />the number of pure populations and expanding the distribution within the historic range. Protection <br />and maintenance of existing populations will likely be insufficient to insure long-term Yellowstone <br />cutthroat existence in some of the smaller streams. There is a very real need to increase population <br />numbers and distribution as an effective hedge against localized extinctions. To the extent biological- <br />ly feasible and socially acceptable, Yellowstone cutthroat trout should be re-established into historic <br />habitats. Decisions associated with restoration should also include provisions for future protection <br />and maintenance. <br /> <br />1. Consideration should be focused on genetic restoration of hybridized populations through <br />repeated introductions of genetically pure individuals. Population specific genetic information <br />will be needed to evaluate the applicability of this option. <br /> <br />2. States should consider replacement of non-native fish species and re-establishment of <br />genetically pure Yellowstone cutthroat populations in as many streams and lakes as practical. <br /> <br />FINAL CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />In addition to protection, maintenance and restoration efforts, there is a need for increased research <br />and education. The current status of Yellowstone cutthroat trout is a result, in large measure, of a poor <br /> <br />25 <br />