Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Unfortunately, many Yellowstone cutthroat trout populations, currently exist as localized remnants <br />(Table 13) of original sub-populations with little or no connectivity. Others owe their existence to <br />hatchery programs. Current estimates indicate that Yellowstone cutthroat occupy 41 % of historic <br />riverine environments throughout the historic range. In addition, there are about 450 lake environ- <br />ments, within the historic range, that currently support Yellowstone cutthroat trout. The number of <br />lake environments currently supporting Yellowstone cutthroat populations represents a 380% in- <br />crease over historic levels. Additionally, there are now numerous riverine and lake populations in <br />existence outside of the historic range (Hadley 1984; Varley and Gresswell 1988) resulting from <br />extensive stocking. <br /> <br />Caution should be applied before developing conclusions relative to overall Yellowstone cutthroat <br />status. With the exception of populations in Montana, most populations have not received sufficient <br />testing for a definitive assessment of genetic status (Table 14). Based on the findings in Montana, <br />genetic contamination is probable for most cutthroat populations that have been exposed to rainbow <br />trout or cutthroat of hatchery origin. As pointed out in this assessment and others previously cited, <br />fragmentation and population isolation has occurred as a result of stream dewatering, replacement <br />by introduced non-native fish, hybridization, substantial environmental change, and overharvest. <br />Many populations find themselves in a form of ecological "catch 22". Most owe their current existence <br />to passage barriers, whether natural or man-made, which have effectively controlled access of both <br />contaminating and competitive species which are present in nearly all areas of the current range <br />(Table 15). At the same time these populations find themselves restricted to relatively small "patches" <br />of habitat that have, in many cases, been degraded by human activity. Viability concerns increase <br />with decreasing "patch" size, declining habitat quality, and complexity, and increased isolation from <br />"source" populations. <br /> <br />Aquatic environments inhabited with Yellowstone cutthroat trout on National Forest lands tend to be <br />in better condition and support more populations. Present estimates indicate that 63% of historic <br />riverine habitats on National Forests still support populations of Yellowstone cutthroat. Most of the <br />currently occupied lake habitats are found on National Forest administered lands. Because of limited <br />genetic testing, caution should be used before development of final conclusions relative to current <br />status within the National Forests. As more definitive genetic information becomes available, it is likely <br />that fewer genetically pure populations will actually exist on the National Forests. <br /> <br />MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS <br /> <br />The long-term well-being of Yellowstone cutthroat trout will require a comprehensive and well coordi- <br />nated conservation approach. A shared vision of goals and objectives between agencies and <br />individuals that have legal responsibilities and vested interests will be essential to long term success. <br />An on-going effort to develop a management guide for Yellowstone cutthroat trout within the Yellow- <br />stone River basin should be a management catalyst for developing the shared vision of responsible <br />agencies and individuals. The "Management Guide" recommends goals for providing protection, <br />maintenance and restoration within the historic range of Yellowstone cutthroat trout. The Manage- <br />ment Guide is equally applicable to the Snake River portion of the historic range. Principle compo- <br />nents associated with the management guide and specific application based on findings of this <br />assessment include the following: <br /> <br />23 <br />