My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7994
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 10:15:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7994
Author
Duff, D. A., Tech. Ed.
Title
Conservation Assessment For Inland Cutthroat Trout, Distribution, Status and Habitat Management Implications.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />indicates that a substantial number of the sub-basins have stream habitat in good to extremely <br />degraded condition (Table 3). There was also a significant level of uncertainty relative to the trend <br />in condition (Table 4). Specific comments pointed to channel dewatering, changes to channel <br />morphology and increased sediment as major factors influencing habitat. <br /> <br />The status of Yellowstone cutthroat trout within National Forest lands in Idaho indicates a somewhat <br />higher (53%) occupancy (Table 1). This assessment did not specify population life history and <br />abundance characteristics for Yellowstone cutthroat trout residing in Forest habitats. There was, <br />however, an effort to identify habitat status and factors contributing to current status (Tables 3 and <br />4). It is important to note that information contained in Tables 3 and 4 may at times seem inconsistent. <br />For some sub-basins more than one condition and/or trend was identified and for other sub-basins <br />condition and/or trend may have been omitted. The same is true for the information associated with <br />factors linked to degradation and the land-use activities associated with those factors. There was also <br />one instance where a sub-basin included two Forests. Of the 19 sub-basins which contained aquatic <br />habitats on National Forests, 47% were identified as having good habitat condition with 37% having <br />a fair rating and 16% having a poor habitat condition (Table 3). For the National Forests, in general, <br />dewatering, changes in temperature, channel modification, limited large woody debris and sediment <br />were viewed as the factors with greatest affect on habitat condition. The land-use that was identified <br />as having the greatest influence was grazing followed by logging, road construction and mining. The <br />Targhee National Forest had the highest proportion of sub-basins (7) with habitat rated as good <br />(86%) and fair (43%). Habitat condition ratings for the Caribou National Forest sub-basins (10) <br />included good (20%), fair (40%) and poor (20%). The Sawtooth National Forest had only three <br />sub-basins with 33% rated as fair and 33% rated as poor. Each Forest had a somewhat different mix <br />of factors and land-use activities which contributed to the condition ratings (Table 4). Channel <br />modification and/or sediment were primarily associated with degraded condition and grazing was <br />identified as the detracting land-use. <br /> <br />Wyominq <br /> <br />The assessment area included the Snake River drainage from the State boundary with Idaho up- <br />stream to the headwaters and the Yellowstone River from the State boundary with Montana upstream <br />to the headwaters. Also included were the major tributaries (e.g. Clarks Fork of the Yellowstone, <br />Bighorn River and Tongue River) that enter the mainstem Yellowstone River's middle section. Twenty <br />five (25) sub-basin analysis units (Table 5) were established and a questionnaire was completed for <br />each. The mainstem Snake River was divided into two analysis units; one section between Palisades <br />Reservoir and Jackson Lake and another from Jackson Lake to the headwaters. In addition, most of <br />the major tributaries (Salt River, Greys River, Hoback River, Gras Ventre River, Spread Creek, Buffalo <br />Fork and Pacific Creek) were treated as separate analysis units. The Yellowstone River assessment <br />included sub-basins within Yellowstone National Park including a sub-basin that extended from the <br />north Park boundary to Yellowstone Falls and an analysis unit that extended from the Falls to the <br />south Park boundary. The headwaters above the Park were treated as a separate assessment unit. <br />The Clarks Fork of the Yellowstone River drainage was treated as a separate unit. Within the Bighorn <br />River drainage there were 9 sub-basins and there were 3 within the Tongue River drainage. <br /> <br />The amount of historical Yellowstone cutthroat trout riverine habitat within Wyoming was estimated <br />at 10,949 miles. This amount included approximately 1,569 miles of stream habitat that would have <br />been occupied by the "fine spotted Snake River" form (Table 5). These mileage estimates are likely <br />an over estimate resulting from the data base from which the information was taken. The particular <br />data base used to provide the mileage information included all perennial streams including many <br />headwater streams that likely would not support fish. Mileage information for the Clarks Fork of the <br />Yellowstone was also included, even though, documentation indicates that the upper portion of the <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.